Comparison Overview

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

VS

NEC Corporation

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

1701 E Mossy Oaks Rd Spring, Houston, Texas, US, 77389
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 700 and 749

Official LinkedIn of Hewlett Packard Enterprise, the global edge-to-cloud company. Sharing our passion and purpose through technology and innovation.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 83,542
Subsidiaries: 24
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
2

NEC Corporation

7-1, Shiba 5-chome, Tokyo, 108-8001, JP
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 800 and 849

NEC Corporation has established itself as a leader in the integration of IT and network technologies while promoting the brand statement of “Orchestrating a brighter world.” NEC enables businesses and communities to adapt to rapid changes taking place in both society and the market as it provides for the social values of safety, security, fairness and efficiency to promote a more sustainable world where everyone has the chance to reach their full potential. For more information, visit NEC at http://www.nec.com NEC's Strengths and Competencies ・Named "2017 Global 100 Most Sustainable Corporations in the World"​ an Index Listing the World’s 100 Most Sustainable Corporations ・Named one of the "World's Top 100 Most Innovative Organizations for 2016"​ by Thomson Reuters ・Face recognition technology achieved No. 1 in the recent Face in Video Evaluation (FIVE, *1) testing performed by the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) (*2) (*1) https://www.nist.gov/programs-projects/face-video-evaluation-five (*2) Results shown from the Face In Video Evaluation (FIVE), the Multiple Biometric Grand Challenge (MBGC), the Multiple Biometric Evaluation (MBE) and the Face Recognition Vendor Test (FRVT) do not constitute endorsement of any particular product by the U.S. Government. ** Please note that we reserve the right to delete any comments posted on NEC Corporation’s LinkedIn page that are deemed extremely defamatory or libelous to any company or individual, or that may be offensive to others.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 17,837
Subsidiaries: 22
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hewlett-packard-enterprise.jpeg
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nec.jpeg
NEC Corporation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
NEC Corporation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

Hewlett Packard Enterprise has 85.19% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NEC Corporation in 2025.

Incident History — Hewlett Packard Enterprise (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hewlett Packard Enterprise cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — NEC Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NEC Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hewlett-packard-enterprise.jpeg
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Hardcoded Credentials
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Unauthenticated Directory Traversal Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Remote Code Execution
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nec.jpeg
NEC Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

NEC Corporation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Hewlett Packard Enterprise company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas NEC Corporation company has not reported any.

In the current year, Hewlett Packard Enterprise company has reported more cyber incidents than NEC Corporation company.

Neither NEC Corporation company nor Hewlett Packard Enterprise company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other NEC Corporation company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither NEC Corporation company nor Hewlett Packard Enterprise company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while NEC Corporation company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Hewlett Packard Enterprise nor NEC Corporation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to NEC Corporation company.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise company employs more people globally than NEC Corporation company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither Hewlett Packard Enterprise nor NEC Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hewlett Packard Enterprise nor NEC Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hewlett Packard Enterprise nor NEC Corporation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hewlett Packard Enterprise nor NEC Corporation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hewlett Packard Enterprise nor NEC Corporation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hewlett Packard Enterprise nor NEC Corporation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X