Comparison Overview

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

VS

LTIMindtree

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

1701 E Mossy Oaks Rd Spring, Houston, Texas, US, 77389
Last Update: 2026-01-16
Between 750 and 799

Official LinkedIn of Hewlett Packard Enterprise, the global edge-to-cloud company. Sharing our passion and purpose through technology and innovation.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 84,415
Subsidiaries: 30
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
3

LTIMindtree

L&T Infotech, Technology Tower. Gate No. 5, Saki Vihar Road, Powai, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400072, IN, Mumbai, MH, IN, 400072
Last Update: 2026-01-19
Between 750 and 799

LTIMindtree is a global technology consulting and digital solutions company that partners with enterprises across industries to reimagine business models, accelerate innovation, and drive AI-centric growth. Trusted by more than 700 clients worldwide, we use advanced technologies to enable operational excellence, elevated customer experiences, and long-term value creation. With a workforce of more than 86,000 talented and entrepreneurial professionals across over 40 countries, LTIMindtree — a Larsen & Toubro Group company — is dedicated to solving complex business challenges and delivering transformation at scale. LTIMindtree is proud to be an equal opportunity employer. We are committed to providing equal employment opportunities regardless of race, ethnicity, nationality, gender, gender identity, gender expression, language, age, sexual orientation, religion, marital status, veteran status, socio-economic status, disability, or any other characteristic protected by applicable law. Please note that neither LTIMindtree nor any of its authorized recruitment agencies/partners charge candidates any registration fees or other fees for appearing in interviews or securing employment/internships. Candidates are solely responsible for verifying the credentials of any agency or consultant claiming to work with LTIMindtree for recruitment purposes. Please note that anyone relying on representations made by fraudulent employment agencies/consultant does so at their own risk. LTIMindtree disclaims any liability for loss or damage suffered as a result of such actions. For more info, please visit www.ltimindtree.com.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 114,189
Subsidiaries: 14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hewlett-packard-enterprise.jpeg
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ltimindtree.jpeg
LTIMindtree
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
LTIMindtree
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hewlett Packard Enterprise in 2026.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LTIMindtree in 2026.

Incident History — Hewlett Packard Enterprise (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hewlett Packard Enterprise cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — LTIMindtree (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LTIMindtree cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hewlett-packard-enterprise.jpeg
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Remote Code Execution (RCE)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Hardcoded Credentials
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Custom Backdoors
Motivation: Long-term persistence and stealth
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ltimindtree.jpeg
LTIMindtree
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

LTIMindtree company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Hewlett Packard Enterprise company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas LTIMindtree company has not reported any.

In the current year, LTIMindtree company and Hewlett Packard Enterprise company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither LTIMindtree company nor Hewlett Packard Enterprise company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other LTIMindtree company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while LTIMindtree company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while LTIMindtree company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Hewlett Packard Enterprise nor LTIMindtree holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to LTIMindtree company.

LTIMindtree company employs more people globally than Hewlett Packard Enterprise company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither Hewlett Packard Enterprise nor LTIMindtree holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hewlett Packard Enterprise nor LTIMindtree holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hewlett Packard Enterprise nor LTIMindtree holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hewlett Packard Enterprise nor LTIMindtree holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hewlett Packard Enterprise nor LTIMindtree holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hewlett Packard Enterprise nor LTIMindtree holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

SummaryA command injection vulnerability (CWE-78) has been found to exist in the `wrangler pages deploy` command. The issue occurs because the `--commit-hash` parameter is passed directly to a shell command without proper validation or sanitization, allowing an attacker with control of `--commit-hash` to execute arbitrary commands on the system running Wrangler. Root causeThe commitHash variable, derived from user input via the --commit-hash CLI argument, is interpolated directly into a shell command using template literals (e.g.,  execSync(`git show -s --format=%B ${commitHash}`)). Shell metacharacters are interpreted by the shell, enabling command execution. ImpactThis vulnerability is generally hard to exploit, as it requires --commit-hash to be attacker controlled. The vulnerability primarily affects CI/CD environments where `wrangler pages deploy` is used in automated pipelines and the --commit-hash parameter is populated from external, potentially untrusted sources. An attacker could exploit this to: * Run any shell command. * Exfiltrate environment variables. * Compromise the CI runner to install backdoors or modify build artifacts. Credits Disclosed responsibly by kny4hacker. Mitigation * Wrangler v4 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v4.59.1 or higher. * Wrangler v3 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v3.114.17 or higher. * Users on Wrangler v2 (EOL) should upgrade to a supported major version.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H