Comparison Overview

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

VS

Allianz Technology

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

1701 E Mossy Oaks Rd Spring, Houston, Texas, US, 77389
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 700 and 749

Official LinkedIn of Hewlett Packard Enterprise, the global edge-to-cloud company. Sharing our passion and purpose through technology and innovation.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 83,542
Subsidiaries: 24
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
2

Allianz Technology

Dieselstraße 8, Unterföhring, Bavaria, 85774, DE
Last Update: 2025-12-01

With its headquarters in Munich, Germany, Allianz Technology is Allianz's global IT service provider and delivers IT solutions that drive the group's digitalization. With more than 13,000 employees in more than 20 countries around the world, Allianz Technology is tasked to run, optimize, transform, and innovate the infrastructure, applications, and services together with Allianz companies to co-create the best customer experience. We service the entire spectrum of digitalization - from one of the industry's largest IT infrastructure projects that spans data centres, networks, and security, to application platforms ranging from workplace services to digital interaction. In short: We deliver comprehensive end-to-end IT solutions for Allianz in the digital age. We are the backbone of Allianz.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 11,283
Subsidiaries: 130
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
6
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hewlett-packard-enterprise.jpeg
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/allianz-technology.jpeg
Allianz Technology
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Allianz Technology
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

Hewlett Packard Enterprise has 85.19% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Allianz Technology in 2025.

Incident History — Hewlett Packard Enterprise (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hewlett Packard Enterprise cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Allianz Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Allianz Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hewlett-packard-enterprise.jpeg
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Hardcoded Credentials
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Unauthenticated Directory Traversal Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Remote Code Execution
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/allianz-technology.jpeg
Allianz Technology
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Third-party CRM compromise, Malware deployment (ransomware), Unauthorized access
Motivation: Data Theft, Financial Gain (likely)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Exploitation of Salesforce Instances, Data Exfiltration
Motivation: Financial Gain, Extortion, Data Theft for Resale or Fraud
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Third-party cloud-based CRM system
Motivation: Data theft
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Allianz Technology company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Hewlett Packard Enterprise company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Allianz Technology company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Hewlett Packard Enterprise company.

In the current year, Allianz Technology company has reported more cyber incidents than Hewlett Packard Enterprise company.

Allianz Technology company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Hewlett Packard Enterprise company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both Allianz Technology company and Hewlett Packard Enterprise company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Allianz Technology company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Hewlett Packard Enterprise company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Allianz Technology company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Hewlett Packard Enterprise nor Allianz Technology holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Allianz Technology company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Hewlett Packard Enterprise company.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise company employs more people globally than Allianz Technology company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither Hewlett Packard Enterprise nor Allianz Technology holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hewlett Packard Enterprise nor Allianz Technology holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hewlett Packard Enterprise nor Allianz Technology holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hewlett Packard Enterprise nor Allianz Technology holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hewlett Packard Enterprise nor Allianz Technology holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hewlett Packard Enterprise nor Allianz Technology holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X