Comparison Overview

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

VS

AeC

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

1701 E Mossy Oaks Rd Spring, Houston, Texas, US, 77389
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 700 and 749

Official LinkedIn of Hewlett Packard Enterprise, the global edge-to-cloud company. Sharing our passion and purpose through technology and innovation.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 83,542
Subsidiaries: 24
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
2

AeC

Rua Espírito Santo, 871 - Bairro Centro, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, BR, 30160-031
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

A AeC é apontada consistentemente como a líder brasileira na entrega de soluções de experiência do cliente e gestão de processos terceirizados. Servindo as principais marcas do mercado nacional, conquistou nos três últimos anos a posição de Empresa do Ano de BPO pela conceituada Frost and Sullivan. Líder também nas práticas de ESG, recebe há oito anos consecutivos o título de Melhor Empresa de Serviços pelo Prêmio Época Negócios 360°. Com um olhar inovador, o seu diferencial está no modo como integra o cuidado com as pessoas e aplica tecnologia de ponta em seus processos, como inteligência artificial, robotic process automation, serviços em nuvem e ferramentas de analytics e segurança. Atualmente, a AeC conta com mais de 52 mil colaboradores em 20 unidades distribuídas por sete estados do país. É certificada pelo instituto Great Place to Work como uma das melhores empresas para se trabalhar. Com uma combinação única de Tecnologia e Calor Humano, a mais de 30 anos de história conquistando, apenas no último ano, 27 importantes prêmios e reconhecimentos do mercado. Venha evoluir conosco! Entre em contato com a gente através do e-mail: [email protected]

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 33,624
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hewlett-packard-enterprise.jpeg
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aec.jpeg
AeC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
AeC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

Hewlett Packard Enterprise has 85.19% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AeC in 2025.

Incident History — Hewlett Packard Enterprise (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hewlett Packard Enterprise cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — AeC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AeC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hewlett-packard-enterprise.jpeg
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Hardcoded Credentials
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Unauthenticated Directory Traversal Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Remote Code Execution
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aec.jpeg
AeC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

AeC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Hewlett Packard Enterprise company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas AeC company has not reported any.

In the current year, Hewlett Packard Enterprise company has reported more cyber incidents than AeC company.

Neither AeC company nor Hewlett Packard Enterprise company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other AeC company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither AeC company nor Hewlett Packard Enterprise company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while AeC company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Hewlett Packard Enterprise nor AeC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to AeC company.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise company employs more people globally than AeC company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither Hewlett Packard Enterprise nor AeC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hewlett Packard Enterprise nor AeC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hewlett Packard Enterprise nor AeC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hewlett Packard Enterprise nor AeC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hewlett Packard Enterprise nor AeC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hewlett Packard Enterprise nor AeC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X