Comparison Overview
HERMES REPLY

HERMES REPLY
Via Nizza, 250, Turin, 10126, IT
Last Update: 17/03/2026
Since 𝟮𝟬𝟬𝟲, Hermes Reply has been the trusted partner for manufacturing companies embracing 𝗱𝗶𝗴𝗶𝘁𝗮𝗹 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘀𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻. We are not simply solution providers, but strategic allies who guide your evolution through 𝘀𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲, 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗴𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲�...

VINCI Energies
2169, Boulevard de la Défense, Nanterre, 92000, FR
Last Update: 31/03/2026
In a world undergoing constant change, VINCI Energies contributes to the environmental transition by helping bring about major trends in the digital landscape and energy sector. VINCI Energies’ teams roll out technologies and integrate customised multi-technical solutio...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

HERMES REPLY







VINCI Energies






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for HERMES REPLY in 2026.
Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for VINCI Energies in 2026.
Incident History - HERMES REPLY (X = Date, Y = Severity)
HERMES REPLY cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - VINCI Energies (X = Date, Y = Severity)
VINCI Energies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

HERMES REPLY

VINCI Energies
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.