Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Hengstler-DynaparHengstler-Dynapar
VS
Rencol Components Ltd.Rencol Components Ltd.
Hengstler-Dynapar

Hengstler-Dynapar

2100 W Broad St, Elizabethtown, North Carolina, 28337, US

Last Update: 23/04/2026

View Profile
744/1000Moderate

Hengstler, Dynapar, Joslyn Clark, Namco, Superior Electric, Veeder-Root, and Eagle Signal are part of a global network of brands known for delivering high-performance industrial solutions. These brands are trusted across a wide range of industries—from manufacturing and...

NAICS:333
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:26
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Rencol Components Ltd.

Rencol Components Ltd.

Unit 2, Avonbridge Trading Estate, Bristol, BS11 9QD, GB

Last Update: 08/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.rencol.com
833/1000Good

Following 100 years of successful design and manufacturing experience in plastic and metals, Rencol Components has built a truly global supply chain - rapidly expanding our range of high-quality, competitively-priced industrial components. Rencol has developed a mature...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:11,548
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Hengstler-Dynapar

Hengstler-Dynapar

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Rencol Components Ltd.

Rencol Components Ltd.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hengstler-Dynapar in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rencol Components Ltd. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Hengstler-Dynapar (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hengstler-Dynapar cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Rencol Components Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rencol Components Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Hengstler-Dynapar

Hengstler-Dynapar

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Rencol Components Ltd.

Rencol Components Ltd.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Hengstler-Dynapar company and Rencol Components Ltd. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Hengstler-Dynapar company and Rencol Components Ltd. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Hengstler-Dynapar company and Rencol Components Ltd. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Hengstler-Dynapar company and Rencol Components Ltd. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Hengstler-Dynapar company and Rencol Components Ltd. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Hengstler-Dynapar company and Rencol Components Ltd. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Hengstler-Dynapar company and Rencol Components Ltd. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Hengstler-Dynapar company and Rencol Components Ltd. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Hengstler-Dynapar company and Rencol Components Ltd. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Hengstler-Dynapar company and Rencol Components Ltd. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Hengstler-Dynapar company and Rencol Components Ltd. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Hengstler-Dynapar and Rencol Components Ltd., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Hengstler-Dynapar and Rencol Components Ltd., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Hengstler-Dynapar or Rencol Components Ltd. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Hengstler-Dynapar or Rencol Components Ltd. ?
Between Hengstler-Dynapar and Rencol Components Ltd., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Hengstler-Dynapar and Rencol Components Ltd., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-90461
SUMMARY

OpenStack Ironic through 38.0.0 may send a username and password to an unexpected remote host when Image Service is configured for HTTP(S) Basic Authentication.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-90460
SUMMARY

An issue was discovered in OpenStack Keystone before 29.0.3. Tokens obtained via delegated authentication methods (EC2 credentials, application credentials, OAuth1 access tokens, and trusts) are not blocked from creating, modifying, or deleting credentials via the /v3/credentials API. EC2-derived tokens can additionally read credential blobs, exposing TOTP MFA seeds and other secrets. Also, PATCH /v3/credentials does not validate the requested post-update project_id, allowing any delegated token to move a credential to an unauthorized project. All Keystone deployments using delegated authentication are affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90457
SUMMARY

The administrative password is hashed using a comparatively weak, fast algorithm for the credential store backing one authentication path, and the file containing that hash is written with permissions allowing it to be read by any local user. This is inconsistent with a separate, stronger hashing algorithm used for the same password on another authentication path. A party able to read this file, including a local user or a party with access to a configuration backup, could feasibly recover the underlying password through offline computation, compromising the administrative credential across every path that accepts it.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90456
SUMMARY

An example environment-configuration file for a bundled inventory-management component ships with a fixed, publicly-known administrative password. A deployment that copies this example file into active configuration without running the setup routine that regenerates credentials will expose that component's administrative interface to anyone aware of the default value.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90455
SUMMARY

A prior update that raised a bundled HTTP client library to a version remediating known vulnerabilities was later reverted, reintroducing the earlier, vulnerable version into a log-processing component. The only code path in that component using the library issues a request to a single fixed, trusted vendor URL at initialization and does not process attacker-controlled input through the library, limiting practical exploitability of the reintroduced version in this context.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA