Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Hengstler-DynaparHengstler-Dynapar
VS
Ingersoll RandIngersoll Rand
Hengstler-Dynapar

Hengstler-Dynapar

2100 W Broad St, Elizabethtown, North Carolina, 28337, US

Last Update: 23/04/2026

View Profile
744/1000Moderate

Hengstler, Dynapar, Joslyn Clark, Namco, Superior Electric, Veeder-Root, and Eagle Signal are part of a global network of brands known for delivering high-performance industrial solutions. These brands are trusted across a wide range of industries—from manufacturing and...

NAICS:333
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:26
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Ingersoll Rand

Ingersoll Rand

525 Harbour Place Drive, Suite 600, Davidson, 28036, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.IRCO.com
777/1000Fair

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE:IR), driven by an entrepreneurial spirit and ownership mindset, is dedicated to Making Life Better for our employees, customers, shareholders, and planet. Customers lean on us for exceptional performance and durability in mission-critical flow ...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:15,139
Subsidiaries:21
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Hengstler-Dynapar

Hengstler-Dynapar

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Ingersoll Rand

Ingersoll Rand

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hengstler-Dynapar in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ingersoll Rand in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Hengstler-Dynapar (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hengstler-Dynapar cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Ingersoll Rand (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ingersoll Rand cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Hengstler-Dynapar

Hengstler-Dynapar

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Ingersoll Rand

Ingersoll Rand

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Hengstler-Dynapar company and Ingersoll Rand company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Hengstler-Dynapar company and Ingersoll Rand company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Hengstler-Dynapar company and Ingersoll Rand company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Hengstler-Dynapar company and Ingersoll Rand company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Hengstler-Dynapar company and Ingersoll Rand company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Hengstler-Dynapar company and Ingersoll Rand company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Hengstler-Dynapar company and Ingersoll Rand company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Hengstler-Dynapar company and Ingersoll Rand company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Hengstler-Dynapar company and Ingersoll Rand company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Hengstler-Dynapar company and Ingersoll Rand company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Hengstler-Dynapar company and Ingersoll Rand company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Hengstler-Dynapar and Ingersoll Rand, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Hengstler-Dynapar and Ingersoll Rand, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Hengstler-Dynapar or Ingersoll Rand ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Hengstler-Dynapar or Ingersoll Rand ?
Between Hengstler-Dynapar and Ingersoll Rand, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Hengstler-Dynapar and Ingersoll Rand, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2