Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

HelioxHeliox
VS
Havells India LtdHavells India Ltd
Heliox

Heliox

150 Ottley Dr NE, Atlanta, 30324, US

Last Update: 10/03/2026

View Profile
749/1000Moderate

Heliox, A Siemens Business, delivers world class EV charging equipment, services, and robust solutions for a broad range of EV fleets. Our portfolio encompasses all aspects of smart and efficient AC and DC charging infrastructure, including IoT-connected hardware, soft...

NAICS:335
NAICS Definition:Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Havells India Ltd

Havells India Ltd

QRG Towers, 2D, Sector 126, Noida, UP, IN, 201304

Last Update: 12/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.havells.com
771/1000Fair

Havells India Limited is a leading FMEG company with a strong global presence, manufacturing a wide range of electrical products for residential, commercial, and industrial use. Key brands include Havells, Havells Studio, Lloyd, Havells Crabtree, Standard Electricals an...

NAICS:335
NAICS Definition:Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing
Employees:15,233
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Heliox

Heliox

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Havells India Ltd

Havells India Ltd

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Heliox in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Havells India Ltd in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Heliox (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Heliox cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Havells India Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Havells India Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Heliox

Heliox

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Havells India Ltd

Havells India Ltd

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Heliox company and Havells India Ltd company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Heliox company and Havells India Ltd company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Heliox company and Havells India Ltd company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Heliox company and Havells India Ltd company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Heliox company and Havells India Ltd company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Heliox company and Havells India Ltd company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Heliox company and Havells India Ltd company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Heliox company and Havells India Ltd company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Heliox company and Havells India Ltd company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Heliox company and Havells India Ltd company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Heliox company and Havells India Ltd company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Heliox and Havells India Ltd, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Heliox and Havells India Ltd, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Heliox or Havells India Ltd ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Heliox or Havells India Ltd ?
Between Heliox and Havells India Ltd, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Heliox and Havells India Ltd, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA