Comparison Overview
Heatrod Elements Ltd

Heatrod Elements Ltd
Unit 10 Top Deck, Smethurst Lane, Bolton, England, BL4 0AN, GB
Last Update: 13/01/2026
Heatrod Elements manufacture both domestic and industrial electric heating products and solutions. Our manufacturing premises is based in north Manchester and we are also part of a global group of companies owned by the Swedish company Nibe Elements. Our products and so...

Delta Electronics
瑞光路, 內湖區, 114, TW
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Delta is a global innovative provider of switching power supplies and DC brushless fans, as well as a major source for power management solutions, components, visual displays, industrial automation, networking products, and renewable energy solutions. Delta Group has sa...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Heatrod Elements Ltd







Delta Electronics






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Heatrod Elements Ltd in 2026.
Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
Delta Electronics has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Heatrod Elements Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Heatrod Elements Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Delta Electronics (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Delta Electronics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Heatrod Elements Ltd

Delta Electronics
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.