Comparison Overview

Health Sciences Authority

VS

TÜV Rheinland Group

Health Sciences Authority

Singapore, SG
Last Update: 2025-12-04
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.hsa.gov.sg

The Health Sciences Authority (HSA) applies medical, pharmaceutical and scientific expertise through its three professional groups, Health Products Regulation, Blood Services and Applied Sciences, to protect and advance national health and safety. HSA is a multidisciplinary authority. It serves as the national regulator for health products, ensuring they are wisely regulated to meet standards of safety, quality and efficacy. As the national blood service, it is responsible for providing a safe and adequate blood supply. It also applies specialised scientific, forensic, investigative and analytical capabilities in serving the administration of justice.

NAICS: 92219
NAICS Definition: Other Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities
Employees: 786
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

TÜV Rheinland Group

Am Grauen Stein, None, Cologne, None, DE, 51105
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799
http://www.tuv.com/impressum

Neutral, independent third party For more than 150 years, TÜV Rheinland has stood for ensuring quality, safety, and efficiency in conjunction with people, the environment, and technology. As a neutral, independent third party, we test, accompany, develop, promote and certify products, plants, processes and management systems as well as services based on legal requirements and other relevant performance benchmarks and standards. In addition, TÜV Rheinland qualifies specialists and trains people for numerous companies and areas of business and life. Using knowledge meaningfully Our greatest capital is based on over 20,000 clever minds: concentrated knowledge. It is our enormous pool of experience from which the people at TÜV Rheinland create exceptional substance and inspiration for their meaningful work. The results of their work can be discovered everywhere: in tested elevators or rides, on certified toys or technical equipment, in our advice or training. No matter where - our international teams have been setting standards in terms of safety, quality and efficiency for many years.

NAICS: 92219
NAICS Definition: Other Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities
Employees: 16,951
Subsidiaries: 16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/health-sciences-authority.jpeg
Health Sciences Authority
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tuv-rheinland-group.jpeg
TÜV Rheinland Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Health Sciences Authority
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
TÜV Rheinland Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Safety Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Health Sciences Authority in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Safety Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TÜV Rheinland Group in 2025.

Incident History — Health Sciences Authority (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Health Sciences Authority cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — TÜV Rheinland Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TÜV Rheinland Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/health-sciences-authority.jpeg
Health Sciences Authority
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/1986
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Improper Data Exposure
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tuv-rheinland-group.jpeg
TÜV Rheinland Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

TÜV Rheinland Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Health Sciences Authority company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Health Sciences Authority company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas TÜV Rheinland Group company has not reported any.

In the current year, TÜV Rheinland Group company and Health Sciences Authority company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither TÜV Rheinland Group company nor Health Sciences Authority company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither TÜV Rheinland Group company nor Health Sciences Authority company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither TÜV Rheinland Group company nor Health Sciences Authority company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Health Sciences Authority company nor TÜV Rheinland Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Health Sciences Authority nor TÜV Rheinland Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

TÜV Rheinland Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Health Sciences Authority company.

TÜV Rheinland Group company employs more people globally than Health Sciences Authority company, reflecting its scale as a Public Safety.

Neither Health Sciences Authority nor TÜV Rheinland Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Health Sciences Authority nor TÜV Rheinland Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Health Sciences Authority nor TÜV Rheinland Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Health Sciences Authority nor TÜV Rheinland Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Health Sciences Authority nor TÜV Rheinland Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Health Sciences Authority nor TÜV Rheinland Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
References
Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
References
Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References