Comparison Overview
HCLTech – Poland

HCLTech – Poland
O3 Campus II, ul. Opolska 112, 31-323, Krakow, PL
Last Update: 13/02/2026
HCLTech is a global technology company, home to more than 223,000 people across 60 countries, delivering industry-leading capabilities centered around digital, engineering, cloud and AI, powered by a broad portfolio of technology services and products. We work with clie...

ITC Infotech
No.18, Banaswadi Main Road, Maruthiseva Nagar, Bangalore, Karnataka, IN, 560005
Last Update: 11/09/2026
ITC Infotech is a global technology solution and services leader providing business-friendly solutions, that enable future-readiness for clients. We seamlessly bring together digital expertise, strong industry-specific alliances, and deep domain expertise from ITC Group...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

HCLTech – Poland







ITC Infotech






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for HCLTech – Poland in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for ITC Infotech in 2026.
Incident History - HCLTech – Poland (X = Date, Y = Severity)
HCLTech – Poland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - ITC Infotech (X = Date, Y = Severity)
ITC Infotech cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

HCLTech – Poland

ITC Infotech
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.
Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.
A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.
Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.