Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

HCLTech – MexicoHCLTech – Mexico
VS
Tech MahindraTech Mahindra
HCLTech – Mexico

HCLTech – Mexico

Blvd. Puerto de Hierro 5153 , Zapopan, 45116, MX

Last Update: 29/01/2026

View Profile
754/1000Fair

HCLTech is a global technology company, home to 225,900+ people across 60 countries, delivering industry-leading capabilities centered around digital, engineering and cloud, powered by a broad portfolio of technology services and products. We work with clients across al...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:28
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Tech Mahindra

Tech Mahindra

Erandwane, Pune, Maharashtra, IN, 411004

Last Update: 09/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.techmahindra.com
776/1000Fair

Tech Mahindra offers technology consulting and digital solutions to global enterprises across industries, enabling transformative scale at unparalleled speed. With 149k+ professionals across 90+ countries helping 1100+ clients, TechM provides a full spectrum of services...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:151,477
Subsidiaries:19
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
HCLTech – Mexico

HCLTech – Mexico

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Tech Mahindra

Tech Mahindra

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HCLTech – Mexico in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tech Mahindra in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - HCLTech – Mexico (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HCLTech – Mexico cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Tech Mahindra (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tech Mahindra cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
HCLTech – Mexico

HCLTech – Mexico

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Tech Mahindra

Tech Mahindra

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
TEC172301022

FAQ

Between HCLTech – Mexico company and Tech Mahindra company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between HCLTech – Mexico company and Tech Mahindra company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between HCLTech – Mexico company and Tech Mahindra company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between HCLTech – Mexico company and Tech Mahindra company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between HCLTech – Mexico company and Tech Mahindra company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between HCLTech – Mexico company and Tech Mahindra company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between HCLTech – Mexico company and Tech Mahindra company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between HCLTech – Mexico company and Tech Mahindra company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between HCLTech – Mexico company and Tech Mahindra company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between HCLTech – Mexico company and Tech Mahindra company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between HCLTech – Mexico company and Tech Mahindra company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between HCLTech – Mexico and Tech Mahindra, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between HCLTech – Mexico and Tech Mahindra, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - HCLTech – Mexico or Tech Mahindra ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - HCLTech – Mexico or Tech Mahindra ?
Between HCLTech – Mexico and Tech Mahindra, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between HCLTech – Mexico and Tech Mahindra, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA