Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

HCLTech – AI and GenAIHCLTech – AI and GenAI
VS
IndraIndra
HCLTech – AI and GenAI

HCLTech – AI and GenAI

HCL Technologies Ltd., Technology Hub, SEZ Plot No. 3A, Sector 126, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, 201304, IN

Last Update: 22/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.hcltech.com/ai
755/1000Fair

HCLTech is a global technology company, home to more than 219,000 people across 60 countries, delivering industry-leading capabilities centered around digital, engineering, cloud and AI, powered by a broad portfolio of technology services and products. We work with clie...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:28
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Indra

Indra

Avda. Bruselas, 35, Madrid, 28108, ES

Last Update: 14/09/2026

View Profile
695/1000Weak

Indra Group (https://www.indragroup.com/) is the foremost Spanish multinational and one of the leading European companies that focus on defence and advanced technologies. It stands at the forefront of the defence, space, air traffic management, mobility, and Information...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:39,371
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
HCLTech – AI and GenAI

HCLTech – AI and GenAI

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Indra

Indra

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HCLTech – AI and GenAI in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

Indra has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - HCLTech – AI and GenAI (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HCLTech – AI and GenAI cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Indra (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Indra cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
HCLTech – AI and GenAI

HCLTech – AI and GenAI

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Indra

Indra

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
IND1782923647

FAQ

Between HCLTech – AI and GenAI company and Indra company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between HCLTech – AI and GenAI company and Indra company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between HCLTech – AI and GenAI company and Indra company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between HCLTech – AI and GenAI company and Indra company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between HCLTech – AI and GenAI company and Indra company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between HCLTech – AI and GenAI company and Indra company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between HCLTech – AI and GenAI company and Indra company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between HCLTech – AI and GenAI company and Indra company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between HCLTech – AI and GenAI company and Indra company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between HCLTech – AI and GenAI company and Indra company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between HCLTech – AI and GenAI company and Indra company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between HCLTech – AI and GenAI and Indra, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between HCLTech – AI and GenAI and Indra, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - HCLTech – AI and GenAI or Indra ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - HCLTech – AI and GenAI or Indra ?
Between HCLTech – AI and GenAI and Indra, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between HCLTech – AI and GenAI and Indra, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA