Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

HCL Infosystems TechnovationHCL Infosystems Technovation
VS
eClerxeClerx
HCL Infosystems Technovation

HCL Infosystems Technovation

Noida, 201301, IN

Last Update: 03/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://hclinfosystems.in/
751/1000Fair

We are pleased to invite you to an exclusive event by HCL Infosystems & Google Cloud on migrating workload to cloud. Moving VMs to the cloud can deliver compelling benefits, but the mechanics of data and workload migration may strain limited IT resources. “Migrate your ...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:27
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
eClerx

eClerx

29 Bank Street, Fort, 1st Floor, Mumbai, Maharashtra, IN, 400 023

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.eclerx.com
756/1000Fair

eClerx is a productized services company, bringing together people, technology and domain expertise to amplify business results. Our mission is to set the benchmark for client service and success in our industry. Our vision is to be the innovation partner of choice for ...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:19,162
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
HCL Infosystems Technovation

HCL Infosystems Technovation

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
eClerx

eClerx

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HCL Infosystems Technovation in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for eClerx in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - HCL Infosystems Technovation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HCL Infosystems Technovation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - eClerx (X = Date, Y = Severity)

eClerx cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
HCL Infosystems Technovation

HCL Infosystems Technovation

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
eClerx

eClerx

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between HCL Infosystems Technovation company and eClerx company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between HCL Infosystems Technovation company and eClerx company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between HCL Infosystems Technovation company and eClerx company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between HCL Infosystems Technovation company and eClerx company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between HCL Infosystems Technovation company and eClerx company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between HCL Infosystems Technovation company and eClerx company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between HCL Infosystems Technovation company and eClerx company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between HCL Infosystems Technovation company and eClerx company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between HCL Infosystems Technovation company and eClerx company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between HCL Infosystems Technovation company and eClerx company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between HCL Infosystems Technovation company and eClerx company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between HCL Infosystems Technovation and eClerx, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between HCL Infosystems Technovation and eClerx, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - HCL Infosystems Technovation or eClerx ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - HCL Infosystems Technovation or eClerx ?
Between HCL Infosystems Technovation and eClerx, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between HCL Infosystems Technovation and eClerx, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA