Comparison Overview
HCL Enterprise

HCL Enterprise
Sector 126, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, IN, 201303
Last Update: 10/03/2026
Founded in 1976 as one of India’s original IT garage start-ups, HCL Group is a pioneer of modern computing with many firsts to its credit, including the introduction of the 8-bit microprocessor-based computer in 1978 well before its global peers. Today, the HCL Group ha...

TEKsystems
7437 Race Road, Hanover, MD, US, 21076
Last Update: 02/04/2026
We’re TEKsystems and TEKsystems Global Services. We accelerate business transformation for our customers, so they can capitalize on change and master the momentum of technology. Our expertise in strategy, design, execution and operations unlocks business value through a...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

HCL Enterprise







TEKsystems






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for HCL Enterprise in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for TEKsystems in 2026.
Incident History - HCL Enterprise (X = Date, Y = Severity)
HCL Enterprise cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - TEKsystems (X = Date, Y = Severity)
TEKsystems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

HCL Enterprise

TEKsystems
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.