Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

HCIactiveHCIactive
VS
Wolters KluwerWolters Kluwer
HCIactive

HCIactive

6011 University Blvd, Ellicott City, 21043, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
http://www.hciactive.com
640/1000Poor

HCIactive is a leading SaaS and PaaS provider transforming the life, accident, and health insurance industry through AI-powered solutions. Our cloud-based technology simplifies benefits management, enhances member engagement, and modernizes administration. From streamli...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:77
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
Wolters Kluwer

Wolters Kluwer

Zuidpoolsingel 2, Alphen aan den Rijn, 2400 BA, NL

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.wolterskluwer.com
751/1000Fair

Wolters Kluwer (EURONEXT: WKL) is a global leader in information, software solutions, and services for professionals in healthcare; tax and accounting; financial and corporate compliance; legal and regulatory; corporate performance and ESG. We help our customers make cr...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:22,994
Subsidiaries:44
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
HCIactive

HCIactive

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Wolters Kluwer

Wolters Kluwer

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HCIactive in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wolters Kluwer in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - HCIactive (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HCIactive cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Wolters Kluwer (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wolters Kluwer cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
HCIactive

HCIactive

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
HCI0593105100325
🔒 Incident : Breach
HCI3093030092325
Wolters Kluwer

Wolters Kluwer

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
WOL443041425

FAQ

Between HCIactive company and Wolters Kluwer company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between HCIactive company and Wolters Kluwer company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between HCIactive company and Wolters Kluwer company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between HCIactive company and Wolters Kluwer company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between HCIactive company and Wolters Kluwer company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between HCIactive company and Wolters Kluwer company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between HCIactive company and Wolters Kluwer company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between HCIactive company and Wolters Kluwer company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between HCIactive company and Wolters Kluwer company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between HCIactive company and Wolters Kluwer company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between HCIactive company and Wolters Kluwer company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between HCIactive and Wolters Kluwer, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between HCIactive and Wolters Kluwer, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - HCIactive or Wolters Kluwer ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - HCIactive or Wolters Kluwer ?
Between HCIactive and Wolters Kluwer, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between HCIactive and Wolters Kluwer, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA