Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

HCF Management, Inc.HCF Management, Inc.
VS
Baylor Scott & White HealthBaylor Scott & White Health
HCF Management, Inc.

HCF Management, Inc.

1100 SHAWNEE RD, Lima, 45805, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://hcfmgmt.com/
717/1000Moderate

HCF Management, Inc. is a place where our tradition of caring, individual respect, and customer satisfaction lays the foundation for the HCF philosophy. Each HCF managed care community has a reputation as a community leader—providing an array of support ranging from ski...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:365
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Baylor Scott & White Health

Baylor Scott & White Health

3500 Gaston Ave, Dallas, 75246, US

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://bswhealth.com
793/1000Fair

With us by your side, there's no stopping you. It's why we're creating a new kind of healthcare at Baylor Scott & White. And we're just getting started. As the largest not-for-profit health system in the state of Texas, Baylor Scott & White promotes the health and well...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:30,629
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
HCF Management, Inc.

HCF Management, Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Baylor Scott & White Health

Baylor Scott & White Health

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HCF Management, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Baylor Scott & White Health in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - HCF Management, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HCF Management, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Baylor Scott & White Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Baylor Scott & White Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
HCF Management, Inc.

HCF Management, Inc.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
HCF230080525
Baylor Scott & White Health

Baylor Scott & White Health

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between HCF Management, Inc. company and Baylor Scott & White Health company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between HCF Management, Inc. company and Baylor Scott & White Health company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between HCF Management, Inc. company and Baylor Scott & White Health company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between HCF Management, Inc. company and Baylor Scott & White Health company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between HCF Management, Inc. company and Baylor Scott & White Health company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between HCF Management, Inc. company and Baylor Scott & White Health company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between HCF Management, Inc. company and Baylor Scott & White Health company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between HCF Management, Inc. company and Baylor Scott & White Health company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between HCF Management, Inc. company and Baylor Scott & White Health company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between HCF Management, Inc. company and Baylor Scott & White Health company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between HCF Management, Inc. company and Baylor Scott & White Health company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between HCF Management, Inc. and Baylor Scott & White Health, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between HCF Management, Inc. and Baylor Scott & White Health, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - HCF Management, Inc. or Baylor Scott & White Health ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - HCF Management, Inc. or Baylor Scott & White Health ?
Between HCF Management, Inc. and Baylor Scott & White Health, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between HCF Management, Inc. and Baylor Scott & White Health, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-8325
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted PDF file, when parsed through Autodesk Revit, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7867
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in udisks2. A local attacker with an active console session can exploit insufficient authorization checking on the 'as-user' option in the org.freedesktop.UDisks2.Filesystem.Mount() D-Bus method. This allows the attacker to spoof the 'as-user' parameter, mounting filesystems on behalf of arbitrary users, including privileged accounts. This can lead to local privilege escalation through mount point injection and manipulation of the mount namespace visible to privileged users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7406
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted BMP file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Untrusted Pointer Dereference vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7405
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted TIF file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products during image import, can cause an Out-of-Bounds Read in the image handling library. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a denial of service

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-71555
SUMMARY

PILOS (Platform for Interactive Live-Online Seminars) is a frontend for BigBlueButton. From 2.1.0 until 4.14.1, PILOS does not send a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy response header, so pages opened by PILOS via a link that opens a new browsing context (e.g., target="_blank") retain a window.opener reference back to the originating PILOS tab. A malicious destination page reached this way can use window.opener to navigate or manipulate the original PILOS tab, a technique known as reverse tabnabbing, potentially redirecting an authenticated user to a phishing page that mimics PILOS. This issue is fixed in version 4.14.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3