Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Tokio Marine HCC – A&H GroupTokio Marine HCC – A&H Group
VS
GroupamaGroupama
Tokio Marine HCC – A&H Group

Tokio Marine HCC – A&H Group

225 TownPark Drive, Kennesaw, 30144, US

Last Update: 12/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://tmhcc.com/AHGroup
753/1000Fair

For over 50 years, HCC Life Insurance Company, operating as Tokio Marine HCC – A&H Group, has been at the forefront of medical stop loss insurance. In addition to traditional stop loss, we offer captive and Taft-Hartley stop loss solutions, level-funded stop loss, Organ...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:283
Subsidiaries:26
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Groupama

Groupama

8-10 rue d'astorg, Paris, 75008, FR

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
780/1000Fair

« Etre là pour les autres, j'ai décidé d'en faire mon métier. » Portée par nos 32 000 collaborateurs, notre campagne de communication employeur souligne ce qui nous rassemble et nous rend fiers au quotidien : notre métier, le point de départ de belles histoires, humain...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:32,114
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Tokio Marine HCC – A&H Group

Tokio Marine HCC – A&H Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Groupama

Groupama

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tokio Marine HCC – A&H Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Groupama in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Tokio Marine HCC – A&H Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tokio Marine HCC – A&H Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Groupama (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Groupama cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Tokio Marine HCC – A&H Group

Tokio Marine HCC – A&H Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Groupama

Groupama

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Tokio Marine HCC – A&H Group company and Groupama company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Tokio Marine HCC – A&H Group company and Groupama company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Tokio Marine HCC – A&H Group company and Groupama company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Tokio Marine HCC – A&H Group company and Groupama company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Tokio Marine HCC – A&H Group company and Groupama company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Tokio Marine HCC – A&H Group company and Groupama company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Tokio Marine HCC – A&H Group company and Groupama company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Tokio Marine HCC – A&H Group company and Groupama company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Tokio Marine HCC – A&H Group company and Groupama company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Tokio Marine HCC – A&H Group company and Groupama company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Tokio Marine HCC – A&H Group company and Groupama company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Tokio Marine HCC – A&H Group and Groupama, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Tokio Marine HCC – A&H Group and Groupama, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Tokio Marine HCC – A&H Group or Groupama ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Tokio Marine HCC – A&H Group or Groupama ?
Between Tokio Marine HCC – A&H Group and Groupama, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Tokio Marine HCC – A&H Group and Groupama, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2