Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

HBI LalehamHBI Laleham
VS
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.
HBI Laleham

HBI Laleham

Sycamore Park, Alton, GU34 2PR, GB

Last Update: 25/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.hbilaleham.com/
754/1000Fair

HBI Laleham is a leading product development and contract services provider to the health & beauty industry, and is part of HBI Health & Beauty Innovations. We offer a diverse range of beauty, food supplement, medical device and pharmaceutical products and services acr...

NAICS:32562
NAICS Definition:Toilet Preparation Manufacturing
Employees:285
Subsidiaries:31
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.

The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.

767 5th Ave, New York, NY, US, 10153

Last Update: 13/07/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
http://www.elcompanies.com
618/1000Poor

The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. is one of the world’s leading manufacturers, marketers, and sellers of quality skin care, makeup, fragrance, and hair care products, and is a steward of outstanding luxury and prestige brands globally. The company’s products are sold in a...

NAICS:32562
NAICS Definition:Toilet Preparation Manufacturing
Employees:52,420
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
HBI Laleham

HBI Laleham

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.

The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Personal Care Product Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HBI Laleham in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Personal Care Product Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. has 90.48% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - HBI Laleham (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HBI Laleham cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
HBI Laleham

HBI Laleham

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.

The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
THE1783960835
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
BROBECTHEORAABB1773750615
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
BRO3105131112625

FAQ

Between HBI Laleham company and The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between HBI Laleham company and The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between HBI Laleham company and The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between HBI Laleham company and The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between HBI Laleham company and The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between HBI Laleham company and The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between HBI Laleham company and The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between HBI Laleham company and The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between HBI Laleham company and The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between HBI Laleham company and The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between HBI Laleham company and The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between HBI Laleham and The Estée Lauder Companies Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between HBI Laleham and The Estée Lauder Companies Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - HBI Laleham or The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - HBI Laleham or The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. ?
Between HBI Laleham and The Estée Lauder Companies Inc., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between HBI Laleham and The Estée Lauder Companies Inc., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-15511
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in Comfast CF-WR631AX V3 up to 2.7.0.8. Affected by this vulnerability is the function system_wl_upload_pic_file of the file /usr/bin/webmgnt of the component FastCGI Backend. This manipulation of the argument filename causes os command injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-12
UPDATED
Date2026-07-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS2
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-15510
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was found in Leantime up to 3.8.0. Affected is the function Setting::saveSetting of the component API. The manipulation results in improper authorization. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-12
UPDATED
Date2026-07-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-15509
SUMMARY

A vulnerability has been found in Leantime up to 3.8.0. This impacts the function editUser/addUser of the component JSON-RPC Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument role leads to improper authorization. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-12
UPDATED
Date2026-07-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-15508
SUMMARY

A flaw has been found in Helicone ai-gateway up to 0.2.0-beta.30. This affects the function build_target_url of the file ai-gateway/src/dispatcher/service.rs of the component AWS Metadata Service. Executing a manipulation of the argument extracted_path_and_query can lead to server-side request forgery. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-12
UPDATED
Date2026-07-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-15507
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was detected in coollabsio Coolify up to 4.1.1. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /app/Policies/ of the component Policy Handler. Performing a manipulation results in missing authorization. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is now public and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-12
UPDATED
Date2026-07-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8