Comparison Overview
HBI Design Plus

HBI Design Plus
Rowan House, Morecambe, LA3 3PU, GB
Last Update: 27/11/2025
HBI Design Plus is the UK’s leading trusted partner in the beauty industry, distinguished by our dynamic and personalised account management service. As a manufacturing partner to health and beauty brands, we drive innovation from concept to market-ready products, ensur...

The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.
767 5th Ave, New York, NY, US, 10153
Last Update: 04/04/2026
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. is one of the world’s leading manufacturers, marketers, and sellers of quality skin care, makeup, fragrance, and hair care products, and is a steward of outstanding luxury and prestige brands globally. The company’s products are sold in a...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

HBI Design Plus







The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Personal Care Product Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for HBI Design Plus in 2026.
Incidents vs Personal Care Product Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - HBI Design Plus (X = Date, Y = Severity)
HBI Design Plus cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

HBI Design Plus

The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.
The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.
Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).
The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.
The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.