Comparison Overview
Havas Worldwide Digital

Havas Worldwide Digital
Burg. A. Colijnweg 2, Amstelveen, undefined, 1182AL, NL
Last Update: 08/02/2026
Havas Worldwide Digital (formerly Euro RSCG 4D) is an agency for attraction advertising, with an emphasis on online and interactive communications projects. Havas Worldwide Digital believes in creative work that customers choose consciously, discuss and add value to. Fo...

Clinic
20-24 Broadwick St, London, W1F 8HT, GB
Last Update: 29/03/2026
Clinic is an independent creative agency. We create bold ideas, and craft them beautifully, to get people thinking, believing and doing. All of our experience goes into what we do today, and although our world’s constantly changing, the endpoint is still people a...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Havas Worldwide Digital







Clinic






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Havas Worldwide Digital in 2026.
Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Clinic in 2026.
Incident History - Havas Worldwide Digital (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Havas Worldwide Digital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Clinic (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Clinic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Havas Worldwide Digital

Clinic
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
phpMyFAQ before 4.1.5 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability in GroupController::updatePermissions that allows GROUP_EDIT administrators to grant arbitrary rights to groups without verifying they hold those rights themselves. A delegated administrator can exploit this by assigning high-value permissions to a group they belong to, inheriting those rights and escalating privileges up to full administrative control.
n8n before 2.25.7 and 2.26.x before 2.26.2 contains an abstract syntax tree (AST) security validator bypass in the Python Code node. An authenticated user with permission to create or modify workflows containing a Python Code node can bypass the validator and access the task executor module namespace. The issue only affects self-hosted instances where the Python Task Runner is enabled; where N8N_BLOCK_RUNNER_ENV_ACCESS is configured to allow it, this can disclose environment variables accessible to the task runner process.
Grav CMS before 2.0.0-beta.2 contains multiple code-execution vulnerabilities. Three unsafe unserialize() calls - in Scheduler\JobQueue, Framework\Cache\Adapter\FileCache, and Session - deserialize untrusted data without restricting allowed classes, enabling PHP object injection and, via a gadget chain, arbitrary code execution where an attacker controls the serialized input. Additionally, InstallCommand's git clone operation passes the branch, url, and path parameters into a shell command without escaping, allowing OS command injection via plugin/theme installation (which requires admin access). A Twig security blocklist bypass (server-side template injection) is also present. The issues are fixed in 2.0.0-beta.2.
Storage Concentrator (SC & SCVM) contains a command injection vulnerability within the debug.pl script that is reachable without authentication. A remote attacker can submit a specially crafted HTTP request containing a malicious payload that is processed without adequate input sanitization, resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges on the underlying system.
Storage Concentrator (SC & SCVM) contains a command injection vulnerability in the ms_service.pl service, which listens on TCP port 9000 by default and accepts custom network packets to perform device actions. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a specially crafted packet containing a malicious payload that is processed without adequate sanitization, resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges.