Comparison Overview
Havas Prague

Havas Prague
Forum Karlín, Pernerova 51, Prague 8, 186 00, CZ
Last Update: 20/03/2026
Our mission is to create meaningful connections between brands and consumers using creativity, innovation and media. We provide a complete spectrum of integrated tools and services across all media platforms. We have extensive in-house capacities and we work with the b...

VML
3 WTC 175 Greenwich Street, New York, New York, US
Last Update: 28/03/2026
VML is a global powerhouse born from the unification of Wunderman Thompson and VMLY&R — two of the world's most powerful and accomplished creative agencies with complementary capabilities and geographic strengths. We have an industry-unique opportunity to provide our cl...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Havas Prague







VML






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Havas Prague in 2026.
Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for VML in 2026.
Incident History - Havas Prague (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Havas Prague cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - VML (X = Date, Y = Severity)
VML cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Havas Prague

VML
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.