Comparison Overview
Havas Media Network Australia

Havas Media Network Australia
121 Harrington St, Sydney, New South Wales, 2000, AU
Last Update: 21/04/2026
At Havas Media Network Australia we want everyone to feel at home. Our sense of community creates a safe and fun environment that enables you to be real, to be who you are, whatever that may be. At our core we are kind, superkind, and we strive to demonstrate behaviors ...

Ogilvy
175 Greenwich St, New York, NY, US, 10007
Last Update: 29/03/2026
Ogilvy has been creating impact for brands through iconic, culture-changing, value-driving ideas since the company was founded by David Ogilvy 75 years ago. We build on that rich legacy through Borderless Creativity – innovating at the intersections of its advertising, ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Havas Media Network Australia







Ogilvy






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Havas Media Network Australia in 2026.
Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Ogilvy in 2026.
Incident History - Havas Media Network Australia (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Havas Media Network Australia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Ogilvy (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Ogilvy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Havas Media Network Australia

Ogilvy
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
phpMyFAQ before 4.1.5 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability in GroupController::updatePermissions that allows GROUP_EDIT administrators to grant arbitrary rights to groups without verifying they hold those rights themselves. A delegated administrator can exploit this by assigning high-value permissions to a group they belong to, inheriting those rights and escalating privileges up to full administrative control.
n8n before 2.25.7 and 2.26.x before 2.26.2 contains an abstract syntax tree (AST) security validator bypass in the Python Code node. An authenticated user with permission to create or modify workflows containing a Python Code node can bypass the validator and access the task executor module namespace. The issue only affects self-hosted instances where the Python Task Runner is enabled; where N8N_BLOCK_RUNNER_ENV_ACCESS is configured to allow it, this can disclose environment variables accessible to the task runner process.
Grav CMS before 2.0.0-beta.2 contains multiple code-execution vulnerabilities. Three unsafe unserialize() calls - in Scheduler\JobQueue, Framework\Cache\Adapter\FileCache, and Session - deserialize untrusted data without restricting allowed classes, enabling PHP object injection and, via a gadget chain, arbitrary code execution where an attacker controls the serialized input. Additionally, InstallCommand's git clone operation passes the branch, url, and path parameters into a shell command without escaping, allowing OS command injection via plugin/theme installation (which requires admin access). A Twig security blocklist bypass (server-side template injection) is also present. The issues are fixed in 2.0.0-beta.2.
Storage Concentrator (SC & SCVM) contains a command injection vulnerability within the debug.pl script that is reachable without authentication. A remote attacker can submit a specially crafted HTTP request containing a malicious payload that is processed without adequate input sanitization, resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges on the underlying system.
Storage Concentrator (SC & SCVM) contains a command injection vulnerability in the ms_service.pl service, which listens on TCP port 9000 by default and accepts custom network packets to perform device actions. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a specially crafted packet containing a malicious payload that is processed without adequate sanitization, resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges.