Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Havas ChinaHavas China
VS
EpsilonEpsilon
Havas China

Havas China

11 Floor, Number 887, Huaihai Zhong Road, Huangpu District, Shanghai, Shanghai, 200020, CN

Last Update: 03/02/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://cn.havas.com
749/1000Moderate

Founded in 1835 in Paris, Havas is one of the world’s largest global communications networks, with more than 22,000 people in over 100 countries sharing one single mission: to make a meaningful difference to brands, businesses, and people. Havas has developed a fully in...

NAICS:541
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:16
Subsidiaries:95
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Epsilon

Epsilon

6021 Connection Drive, Irving, Texas, US, 75039

Last Update: 15/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.epsilon.com
783/1000Fair

Epsilon is a global data, technology and services company that powers the marketing and advertising ecosystem. The world’s leading brands use Epsilon to harmonize consumer engagement across their paid, owned and earned channels, leveraging capabilities that include da...

NAICS:541613
NAICS Definition:Marketing Consulting Services
Employees:10,919
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Havas China

Havas China

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Epsilon

Epsilon

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Havas China in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Epsilon in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Havas China (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Havas China cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Epsilon (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Epsilon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Havas China

Havas China

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Epsilon

Epsilon

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
EPS153827123
🔒 Incident : Breach
EPS458072625

FAQ

Between Havas China company and Epsilon company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Havas China company and Epsilon company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Havas China company and Epsilon company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Havas China company and Epsilon company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Havas China company and Epsilon company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Havas China company and Epsilon company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Havas China company and Epsilon company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Havas China company and Epsilon company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Havas China company and Epsilon company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Havas China company and Epsilon company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Havas China company and Epsilon company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Havas China and Epsilon, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Havas China and Epsilon, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Havas China or Epsilon ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Havas China or Epsilon ?
Between Havas China and Epsilon, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Havas China and Epsilon, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA