Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Havas B2BHavas B2B
VS
McKinsey & CompanyMcKinsey & Company
Havas B2B

Havas B2B

29-30, Quai de Dion Bouton, Puteaux, 92800, FR

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://havasparis.com/
751/1000Fair

Chez Havas Paris, nous plaçons la marque meaningful au centre du B2B. Dans le monde de l’entreprise, elle est un véritable atout business : elle agit comme un repère stratégique, fédère des communautés, attire les talents et accélère la performance. Notre approche s’a...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
McKinsey & Company

McKinsey & Company

US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.mckinsey.com
815/1000Good

McKinsey & Company is a global management consulting firm. We are the trusted advisor to the world's leading businesses, governments, and institutions. We work with leading organizations across the private, public and social sectors. Our scale, scope, and knowledge ...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:38,633
Subsidiaries:44
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Havas B2B

Havas B2B

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
McKinsey & Company

McKinsey & Company

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Havas B2B in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

McKinsey & Company has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Havas B2B (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Havas B2B cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - McKinsey & Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

McKinsey & Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Havas B2B

Havas B2B

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
McKinsey & Company

McKinsey & Company

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
MCK1773109656

FAQ

Between Havas B2B company and McKinsey & Company company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Havas B2B company and McKinsey & Company company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Havas B2B company and McKinsey & Company company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Havas B2B company and McKinsey & Company company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Havas B2B company and McKinsey & Company company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Havas B2B company and McKinsey & Company company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Havas B2B company and McKinsey & Company company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Havas B2B company and McKinsey & Company company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Havas B2B company and McKinsey & Company company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Havas B2B company and McKinsey & Company company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Havas B2B company and McKinsey & Company company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Havas B2B and McKinsey & Company, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Havas B2B and McKinsey & Company, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Havas B2B or McKinsey & Company ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Havas B2B or McKinsey & Company ?
Between Havas B2B and McKinsey & Company, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Havas B2B and McKinsey & Company, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-8325
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted PDF file, when parsed through Autodesk Revit, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7867
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in udisks2. A local attacker with an active console session can exploit insufficient authorization checking on the 'as-user' option in the org.freedesktop.UDisks2.Filesystem.Mount() D-Bus method. This allows the attacker to spoof the 'as-user' parameter, mounting filesystems on behalf of arbitrary users, including privileged accounts. This can lead to local privilege escalation through mount point injection and manipulation of the mount namespace visible to privileged users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7406
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted BMP file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Untrusted Pointer Dereference vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7405
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted TIF file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products during image import, can cause an Out-of-Bounds Read in the image handling library. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a denial of service

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-71555
SUMMARY

PILOS (Platform for Interactive Live-Online Seminars) is a frontend for BigBlueButton. From 2.1.0 until 4.14.1, PILOS does not send a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy response header, so pages opened by PILOS via a link that opens a new browsing context (e.g., target="_blank") retain a window.opener reference back to the originating PILOS tab. A malicious destination page reached this way can use window.opener to navigate or manipulate the original PILOS tab, a technique known as reverse tabnabbing, potentially redirecting an authenticated user to a phishing page that mimics PILOS. This issue is fixed in version 4.14.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3