Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Hyundai America Technical Center, Inc. (HATCI)Hyundai America Technical Center, Inc. (HATCI)
VS
Mercedes-Benz USAMercedes-Benz USA
Hyundai America Technical Center, Inc. (HATCI)

Hyundai America Technical Center, Inc. (HATCI)

6800 Geddes Road, Superior Township, 48198, US

Last Update: 27/11/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.hatci.com
751/1000Fair

Hyundai America Technical Center, Inc. ("HATCI"​), is the design, technology and engineering arm for all North American models of the Korean-based Hyundai-KIA Automotive Group. Hyundai America Technical Center, Inc (HATCI) hires talented engineers, designers, technici...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:840
Subsidiaries:40
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Mercedes-Benz USA

Mercedes-Benz USA

303 Perimeter Center North, Atlanta, 30346, US

Last Update: 17/06/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.mbusa.com
788/1000Fair

Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC (MBUSA), a Daimler Company, is responsible for the Distribution and Marketing of Mercedes-Benz and smart products in the United States. MBUSA was founded in 1965 and prior to that Mercedes-Benz cars were sold in the United States by Mercedes-Benz...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:12,384
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Hyundai America Technical Center, Inc. (HATCI)

Hyundai America Technical Center, Inc. (HATCI)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Mercedes-Benz USA

Mercedes-Benz USA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hyundai America Technical Center, Inc. (HATCI) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Mercedes-Benz USA has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Hyundai America Technical Center, Inc. (HATCI) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hyundai America Technical Center, Inc. (HATCI) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Mercedes-Benz USA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mercedes-Benz USA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Hyundai America Technical Center, Inc. (HATCI)

Hyundai America Technical Center, Inc. (HATCI)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Mercedes-Benz USA

Mercedes-Benz USA

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
MERCHESAMCOMFOXATTFORTOY1781713752

FAQ

Between Hyundai America Technical Center, Inc. (HATCI) company and Mercedes-Benz USA company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Hyundai America Technical Center, Inc. (HATCI) company and Mercedes-Benz USA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Hyundai America Technical Center, Inc. (HATCI) company and Mercedes-Benz USA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Hyundai America Technical Center, Inc. (HATCI) company and Mercedes-Benz USA company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Hyundai America Technical Center, Inc. (HATCI) company and Mercedes-Benz USA company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Hyundai America Technical Center, Inc. (HATCI) company and Mercedes-Benz USA company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Hyundai America Technical Center, Inc. (HATCI) company and Mercedes-Benz USA company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Hyundai America Technical Center, Inc. (HATCI) company and Mercedes-Benz USA company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Hyundai America Technical Center, Inc. (HATCI) company and Mercedes-Benz USA company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Hyundai America Technical Center, Inc. (HATCI) company and Mercedes-Benz USA company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Hyundai America Technical Center, Inc. (HATCI) company and Mercedes-Benz USA company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Hyundai America Technical Center, Inc. (HATCI) and Mercedes-Benz USA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Hyundai America Technical Center, Inc. (HATCI) and Mercedes-Benz USA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Hyundai America Technical Center, Inc. (HATCI) or Mercedes-Benz USA ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Hyundai America Technical Center, Inc. (HATCI) or Mercedes-Benz USA ?
Between Hyundai America Technical Center, Inc. (HATCI) and Mercedes-Benz USA, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Hyundai America Technical Center, Inc. (HATCI) and Mercedes-Benz USA, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2