Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Hatch BankHatch Bank
VS
Banco BradescoBanco Bradesco
Hatch Bank

Hatch Bank

San Marcos, 92078, US

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://www.hatchbank.com
681/1000Weak

Hatch functions as the central support infrastructure for a variety of financial products through our platform, Powered by Hatch®. We serve as a critical and trusted ally to our fintech partners, breaking through with flexible and adaptable lending, credit and deposit s...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:26
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
Banco Bradesco

Banco Bradesco

Cidade de Deus, s/n, Osasco, São Paulo, BR, 06029-900

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://banco.bradesco
770/1000Fair

O Bradesco é um dos líderes do setor financeiro privado e um dos maiores empregadores na categoria. Além disso, apresenta o melhor índice de eficiência entre os bancos de varejo. Nossa missão é fornecer soluções, produtos e serviços financeiros e de seguros com agil...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:87,598
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Hatch Bank

Hatch Bank

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Banco Bradesco

Banco Bradesco

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hatch Bank in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Banco Bradesco in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Hatch Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hatch Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Banco Bradesco (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Banco Bradesco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Hatch Bank

Hatch Bank

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
HAT182781023
🔒 Incident : Breach
HAT636072625
Banco Bradesco

Banco Bradesco

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
MASBRA1769236185
🔒 Incident : Breach
BRA734082025

FAQ

Between Hatch Bank company and Banco Bradesco company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Hatch Bank company and Banco Bradesco company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Hatch Bank company and Banco Bradesco company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Hatch Bank company and Banco Bradesco company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Hatch Bank company and Banco Bradesco company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Hatch Bank company and Banco Bradesco company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Hatch Bank company and Banco Bradesco company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Hatch Bank company and Banco Bradesco company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Hatch Bank company and Banco Bradesco company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Hatch Bank company and Banco Bradesco company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Hatch Bank company and Banco Bradesco company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Hatch Bank and Banco Bradesco, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Hatch Bank and Banco Bradesco, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Hatch Bank or Banco Bradesco ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Hatch Bank or Banco Bradesco ?
Between Hatch Bank and Banco Bradesco, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Hatch Bank and Banco Bradesco, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA