Comparison Overview
HashiCorp

HashiCorp
101 2nd St, San Francisco, 94105, US
Last Update: 29/03/2026
At HashiCorp, we believe infrastructure enables innovation, and we are helping organizations to operate that infrastructure in the cloud. Our suite of multi-cloud infrastructure automation products — all with open source projects at their core — underpin the most import...

Cadence
2655 Seely Avenue, San Jose, California, US, 95134
Last Update: 17/09/2026
Cadence is a market leader in AI and digital twins, pioneering the application of computational software to accelerate innovation in the engineering design of silicon to systems. Our design solutions, based on Cadence’s Intelligent System Design™ strategy, are essential...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

HashiCorp







Cadence






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
HashiCorp has 4.76% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Cadence in 2026.
Incident History - HashiCorp (X = Date, Y = Severity)
HashiCorp cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Cadence (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Cadence cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

HashiCorp

Cadence
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.
Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.
A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.
Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.