Comparison Overview
Harvest Groupe

Harvest Groupe
5, Rue de la Baume, Paris, 75008, FR
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Un éditeur de référence sur le marché du logiciel patrimonial Harvest est un éditeur de logiciels spécialisé sur les métiers du conseil financier et patrimonial, présent auprès de tous les acteurs du secteur : réseaux bancaires, compagnies d’assurance, sociétés de ge...

OpenText
275 Frank Tompa Drive, Waterloo, ON, CA, N2L 0A1
Last Update: 01/04/2026
OpenText is a leading Cloud and AI company that provides organizations around the world with a comprehensive suite of Business AI, Business Clouds, and Business Technology. We help organizations grow, innovate, become more efficient and effective, and do so in a trusted...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Harvest Groupe







OpenText






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Harvest Groupe in 2026.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for OpenText in 2026.
Incident History - Harvest Groupe (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Harvest Groupe cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - OpenText (X = Date, Y = Severity)
OpenText cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Harvest Groupe

OpenText
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.