Comparison Overview
Prevention Research Center on Nutrition and Physical Activity at Harvard Chan School

Prevention Research Center on Nutrition and Physical Activity at Harvard Chan School
N/A
Last Update: 30/12/2025
The mission of the Prevention Research Center on Nutrition and Physical Activity at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health is to work with community partners to develop, implement, evaluate, and disseminate cost-effective and evidence-based policies and programs ...

Arizona State University
1151 S Forest Ave, Tempe, AZ, US, 85281
Last Update: 29/03/2026
ASU has developed a new model for the American research university, creating an institution committed to excellence, access and impact — the New American University. Nationally and internationally acclaimed, ASU ranks among the very best in nearly every critical measu...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Prevention Research Center on Nutrition and Physical Activity at Harvard Chan School







Arizona State University






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Prevention Research Center on Nutrition and Physical Activity at Harvard Chan School in 2026.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Arizona State University in 2026.
Incident History - Prevention Research Center on Nutrition and Physical Activity at Harvard Chan School (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Prevention Research Center on Nutrition and Physical Activity at Harvard Chan School cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Arizona State University (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Arizona State University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Prevention Research Center on Nutrition and Physical Activity at Harvard Chan School

Arizona State University
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
phpMyFAQ before 4.1.5 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability in GroupController::updatePermissions that allows GROUP_EDIT administrators to grant arbitrary rights to groups without verifying they hold those rights themselves. A delegated administrator can exploit this by assigning high-value permissions to a group they belong to, inheriting those rights and escalating privileges up to full administrative control.
n8n before 2.25.7 and 2.26.x before 2.26.2 contains an abstract syntax tree (AST) security validator bypass in the Python Code node. An authenticated user with permission to create or modify workflows containing a Python Code node can bypass the validator and access the task executor module namespace. The issue only affects self-hosted instances where the Python Task Runner is enabled; where N8N_BLOCK_RUNNER_ENV_ACCESS is configured to allow it, this can disclose environment variables accessible to the task runner process.
Grav CMS before 2.0.0-beta.2 contains multiple code-execution vulnerabilities. Three unsafe unserialize() calls - in Scheduler\JobQueue, Framework\Cache\Adapter\FileCache, and Session - deserialize untrusted data without restricting allowed classes, enabling PHP object injection and, via a gadget chain, arbitrary code execution where an attacker controls the serialized input. Additionally, InstallCommand's git clone operation passes the branch, url, and path parameters into a shell command without escaping, allowing OS command injection via plugin/theme installation (which requires admin access). A Twig security blocklist bypass (server-side template injection) is also present. The issues are fixed in 2.0.0-beta.2.
Storage Concentrator (SC & SCVM) contains a command injection vulnerability within the debug.pl script that is reachable without authentication. A remote attacker can submit a specially crafted HTTP request containing a malicious payload that is processed without adequate input sanitization, resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges on the underlying system.
Storage Concentrator (SC & SCVM) contains a command injection vulnerability in the ms_service.pl service, which listens on TCP port 9000 by default and accepts custom network packets to perform device actions. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a specially crafted packet containing a malicious payload that is processed without adequate sanitization, resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges.