Comparison Overview

Harvard Pilgrim Health Care

VS

Gold's Gym

Harvard Pilgrim Health Care

1 Wellness Way, None, Canton, Massachusetts, US, 02021
Last Update: 2025-12-11

Harvard Pilgrim and its family of companies provide health benefit plans, programs and services to more than 3 million customers in New England and beyond. A leading not-for-profit health services company, we guide our members–and the communities we serve–to better health. Founded by doctors nearly 50 years ago, we’re building on our legacy. In partnership with our expansive network of doctors and hospitals, we’re improving health outcomes and lowering costs through clinical quality and innovative care management.

NAICS: 71394
NAICS Definition: Fitness and Recreational Sports Centers
Employees: 884
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Gold's Gym

5420 Lyndon B Johnson Fwy, Dallas, Texas, 75240, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Gold’s Gym has been the world’s trusted fitness authority since 1965. From its beginning as a small gym in Venice, California, Gold’s Gym has grown into a global icon with more than 700 locations serving 3 million people across six continents each day. Whether you are an industry professional or interested in pursuing a dream to make your passion for Fitness a meaningful reality, we want to help you transform your life. Our journey started on a beach in California, yours starts today. Join our Talent Network to receive updates on open positions. http://www.goldsgym.com/join-our-team

NAICS: 71394
NAICS Definition: Fitness and Recreational Sports Centers
Employees: 15,763
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/harvard-pilgrim-health-care.jpeg
Harvard Pilgrim Health Care
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gold's-gym.jpeg
Gold's Gym
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Harvard Pilgrim Health Care
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Gold's Gym
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Wellness and Fitness Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Harvard Pilgrim Health Care in 2025.

Incidents vs Wellness and Fitness Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gold's Gym in 2025.

Incident History — Harvard Pilgrim Health Care (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Harvard Pilgrim Health Care cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Gold's Gym (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gold's Gym cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/harvard-pilgrim-health-care.jpeg
Harvard Pilgrim Health Care
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2023
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: External Hacking
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gold's-gym.jpeg
Gold's Gym
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Gold's Gym company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Harvard Pilgrim Health Care company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Harvard Pilgrim Health Care company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Gold's Gym company has not reported any.

In the current year, Gold's Gym company and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Harvard Pilgrim Health Care company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Gold's Gym company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Harvard Pilgrim Health Care company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Gold's Gym company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Gold's Gym company nor Harvard Pilgrim Health Care company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Harvard Pilgrim Health Care company nor Gold's Gym company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Harvard Pilgrim Health Care nor Gold's Gym holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Harvard Pilgrim Health Care company nor Gold's Gym company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Gold's Gym company employs more people globally than Harvard Pilgrim Health Care company, reflecting its scale as a Wellness and Fitness Services.

Neither Harvard Pilgrim Health Care nor Gold's Gym holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Harvard Pilgrim Health Care nor Gold's Gym holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Harvard Pilgrim Health Care nor Gold's Gym holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Harvard Pilgrim Health Care nor Gold's Gym holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Harvard Pilgrim Health Care nor Gold's Gym holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Harvard Pilgrim Health Care nor Gold's Gym holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L