Badge
11,371 badges added since 01 January 2025
ISO 27001 Certificate
SOC 1 Type I Certificate
SOC 2 Type II Certificate
PCI DSS
HIPAA
RGPD
Internal validation & live display
Multiple badges & continuous verification
Faster underwriting decisions
ISOSOC2 Type 1SOC2 Type 2PCI DSSHIPAAGDPR

At Harvard Medical School, our mission is to create and nurture a diverse community of the best people committed to leadership in alleviating human suffering caused by disease. With our vast reservoir of talent, extensive network of affiliates and commitment to problem solving, Harvard Medical School is uniquely positioned to steer education and research in directions that will benefit local, national, and global communities. — MD Programs: 3 4-year degree programs – HST MD Program, New Pathway, and Combined Degree Programs. — External Education: Non-degree programs for working professionals. — Continuing Education: Over 200 live, online, or regularly scheduled series classes for talented professionals. — Faculty: the faculty of Medicine includes more than 12,000 individuals working to advance the boundaries of knowledge in labs, classrooms, and clinics. — Affiliates: 17 affiliation agreements with the world’s most prestigious hospitals and research institutes that serve as home base for more than 10,000 physicians and scientists with faculty appointments. — Awards: 9 Nobel Prizes (Medicine or Physiology; Peace) by 15 recipients, 37 Howard Hughes Medical Institute investigators, 147 National Academy of Medicine members, and 68 National Academy of Sciences members. Please visit the HMS Company page at https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvard-medical-school for information on open positions.

Harvard Medical School A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

HMS

Company Details

Linkedin ID:

harvard-medical-school

Employees number:

11,471

Number of followers:

409,034

NAICS:

6113

Industry Type:

Higher Education

Homepage:

harvard.edu

IP Addresses:

0

Company ID:

HAR_2142176

Scan Status:

In-progress

AI scoreHMS Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 800 and 849

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/harvard-medical-school.jpeg
HMS Higher Education
Updated:
  • Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
  • Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
globalscoreHMS Global Score (TPRM)

XXXX

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/harvard-medical-school.jpeg
HMS Higher Education
  • Instant access to detailed risk factors
  • Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
  • Vulnerabilities
  • Findings

HMS Company CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents
1
Attack Types
1
EntityTypeSeverityImpactSeenBlog DetailsSupply Chain SourceIncident DetailsView
Harvard Medical SchoolBreach8541/2026NA
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: Higher Education Under Siege: A Wave of Cyberattacks Exposes Systemic Vulnerabilities In the first half of 2025, a surge of cyberattacks has targeted major U.S. universities, exposing critical weaknesses in higher education’s cybersecurity defenses. The University of Pennsylvania, Harvard University, and Princeton University all reported breaches within the past two months, following earlier incidents at Columbia University, Dartmouth College, and New York University. Each institution confirmed the attacks stemmed from social engineering, with Harvard and Princeton specifically citing phone-based phishing as the entry point. Officials at the affected schools stated they acted swiftly to contain the breaches and are reinforcing security measures. However, experts warn that universities face an uphill battle. Mike Corn, a former chief information security officer in higher education and current consultant at Vantage Technology, noted that colleges operate like "small cities," with decentralized networks, personal devices, and diverse user behaviors creating countless vulnerabilities. Even robust investments in cybersecurity, he argued, cannot guarantee immunity from attacks especially as AI-driven threats grow more sophisticated. The challenges extend beyond technology. Brian Nichols, CIO at the University of Kentucky, highlighted that while phishing simulations and training have improved awareness, they are not foolproof. Anita Nikolich, director of research and technology innovation at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, warned that punitive security measures can backfire, alienating faculty who may resist protocols perceived as restrictive. A core tension lies in academic freedom versus centralized IT control: many universities allow individual departments such as medical or business schools to maintain separate IT teams, increasing risk. Nikolich, who previously led IT infrastructure at the University of Chicago, described this fragmentation as a "huge risk factor," as decentralized systems complicate consistent security enforcement. Faculty resistance further complicates the issue. Janice Lanham, a nursing lecturer at Clemson University, nearly fell victim to a phishing scam but caught the deception in time. Yet, as Brian Voss, Clemson’s CIO, observed, some professors view security protocols as obstacles to research and teaching. Voss described a "culture of subservience" in higher-ed IT, where departments prioritize faculty demands over security, often retaining excessive data including sensitive information like Social Security numbers despite the risks. His efforts to reduce data storage have met resistance, with one university even retaining personal data for voter registration purposes, creating what he called "piles of gold for bad guys." The conflict between research needs and security is particularly acute. Nikolich, who also conducts quantum computing research, faced initial pushback when requesting network data for her work. After demonstrating the data’s non-sensitive nature and potential security benefits, she gained access but noted that other universities default to blanket denials. When researchers are blocked, she warned, they often bypass official channels, increasing exposure. The solution, Nikolich suggested, lies in collaboration: IT, security teams, and faculty must treat cybersecurity as a shared priority, balancing innovation with protection. Until then, universities remain prime targets caught between the demands of open academic environments and the escalating sophistication of cyber threats.

Dartmouth College, Harvard University, Princeton University, Columbia University and Clemson University: Why Cyberattacks in Higher Ed Keep Proliferating
Breach
Severity: 85
Impact: 4
Seen: 1/2026
Blog:
Supply Chain Source: NA
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: Higher Education Under Siege: A Wave of Cyberattacks Exposes Systemic Vulnerabilities In the first half of 2025, a surge of cyberattacks has targeted major U.S. universities, exposing critical weaknesses in higher education’s cybersecurity defenses. The University of Pennsylvania, Harvard University, and Princeton University all reported breaches within the past two months, following earlier incidents at Columbia University, Dartmouth College, and New York University. Each institution confirmed the attacks stemmed from social engineering, with Harvard and Princeton specifically citing phone-based phishing as the entry point. Officials at the affected schools stated they acted swiftly to contain the breaches and are reinforcing security measures. However, experts warn that universities face an uphill battle. Mike Corn, a former chief information security officer in higher education and current consultant at Vantage Technology, noted that colleges operate like "small cities," with decentralized networks, personal devices, and diverse user behaviors creating countless vulnerabilities. Even robust investments in cybersecurity, he argued, cannot guarantee immunity from attacks especially as AI-driven threats grow more sophisticated. The challenges extend beyond technology. Brian Nichols, CIO at the University of Kentucky, highlighted that while phishing simulations and training have improved awareness, they are not foolproof. Anita Nikolich, director of research and technology innovation at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, warned that punitive security measures can backfire, alienating faculty who may resist protocols perceived as restrictive. A core tension lies in academic freedom versus centralized IT control: many universities allow individual departments such as medical or business schools to maintain separate IT teams, increasing risk. Nikolich, who previously led IT infrastructure at the University of Chicago, described this fragmentation as a "huge risk factor," as decentralized systems complicate consistent security enforcement. Faculty resistance further complicates the issue. Janice Lanham, a nursing lecturer at Clemson University, nearly fell victim to a phishing scam but caught the deception in time. Yet, as Brian Voss, Clemson’s CIO, observed, some professors view security protocols as obstacles to research and teaching. Voss described a "culture of subservience" in higher-ed IT, where departments prioritize faculty demands over security, often retaining excessive data including sensitive information like Social Security numbers despite the risks. His efforts to reduce data storage have met resistance, with one university even retaining personal data for voter registration purposes, creating what he called "piles of gold for bad guys." The conflict between research needs and security is particularly acute. Nikolich, who also conducts quantum computing research, faced initial pushback when requesting network data for her work. After demonstrating the data’s non-sensitive nature and potential security benefits, she gained access but noted that other universities default to blanket denials. When researchers are blocked, she warned, they often bypass official channels, increasing exposure. The solution, Nikolich suggested, lies in collaboration: IT, security teams, and faculty must treat cybersecurity as a shared priority, balancing innovation with protection. Until then, universities remain prime targets caught between the demands of open academic environments and the escalating sophistication of cyber threats.

Ailogo

HMS Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
Incident Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan
statics

Underwriter Stats for HMS

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Harvard Medical School in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Harvard Medical School in 2026.

Incident Types HMS vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Harvard Medical School in 2026.

Incident History — HMS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HMS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

HMS Company Subsidiaries

SubsidiaryImage

At Harvard Medical School, our mission is to create and nurture a diverse community of the best people committed to leadership in alleviating human suffering caused by disease. With our vast reservoir of talent, extensive network of affiliates and commitment to problem solving, Harvard Medical School is uniquely positioned to steer education and research in directions that will benefit local, national, and global communities. — MD Programs: 3 4-year degree programs – HST MD Program, New Pathway, and Combined Degree Programs. — External Education: Non-degree programs for working professionals. — Continuing Education: Over 200 live, online, or regularly scheduled series classes for talented professionals. — Faculty: the faculty of Medicine includes more than 12,000 individuals working to advance the boundaries of knowledge in labs, classrooms, and clinics. — Affiliates: 17 affiliation agreements with the world’s most prestigious hospitals and research institutes that serve as home base for more than 10,000 physicians and scientists with faculty appointments. — Awards: 9 Nobel Prizes (Medicine or Physiology; Peace) by 15 recipients, 37 Howard Hughes Medical Institute investigators, 147 National Academy of Medicine members, and 68 National Academy of Sciences members. Please visit the HMS Company page at https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvard-medical-school for information on open positions.

Loading...
similarCompanies

HMS Similar Companies

University of Pennsylvania

The University of Pennsylvania is one of the oldest universities in America and, as a member of the Ivy League, one of the most prestigious institutions of higher learning in all the world. Penn is home to 12 schools including the School of Arts and Sciences, the School of Nursing, the School of Eng

Amity University

Amity University is India's top ranked non-profit private University where more emphasis is given on not only making you academically brilliant, but true leaders and team players, thus preparing you for the real life corporate world. Amity is the leading education group of India with Most Hi-tech Ca

University of Delaware

The University of Delaware - a state assisted, privately chartered institution - is a Land Grant, Sea Grant, Space Grant and Carnegie Research University (very high research activity). The University, with origins in 1743, was chartered by the State of Delaware in 1833. A Women's College was opened

Università degli Studi di Milano

L’Università degli Studi di Milano è un ateneo a vocazione interdisciplinare e internazionale, che riesce a coniugare tradizione e innovazione per rispondere alle sfide di una società in forte cambiamento. Fondata nel 1924, a 100 dalla sua nascita, l’Università milanese si prepara a diventare, entr

The Ohio State University

One of the largest universities in the United States, The Ohio State University is a leading research university and the model for Ohio's public higher education institutes. Founded in 1870 as a land-grant university, it consistently ranks as one of the top public universities in the United States.

Cairo University

A comprehensive institution of higher learning located in Giza, Egypt, is committed to preparing students for the challenges of a rapidly changing workplace. Through interactive learning and new information technologies, our graduates are poised to enter the work force with the skills needed to

The University of Georgia

The University of Georgia, a land-grant and sea-grant university with state-wide commitments and responsibilities, is the state's flagship institution of higher education. It is also the state's oldest, most comprehensive and most diversified institution of higher education. Its motto, "to teach, to

University of Buenos Aires

La Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA) es la universidad pública más importante de Argentina. Es reconocida por los principales rankings internacionales como la mejor universidad de Iberoamérica. Actualmente, ocupa el puesto Nº 67 en el Ranking QS global. Su modelo de gratuidad, excelencia académica

Universidad Complutense de Madrid

La Universidad Complutense de Madrid es una universidad pública de calidad al servicio de la sociedad. Sus estudiantes son el eje principal de su actividad por ello, la UCM apuesta por una formación integral y crítica del más alto nivel. Su oferta para el curso 2016-17 es inigualable: 82 grados

newsone

HMS CyberSecurity News

January 13, 2026 09:13 PM
Former Harvard Dental Dean Bruce Donoff Dies at 83

Bruce Donoff, DMD, MD, former HSDM dean and advocate for integrating oral and general medicine, led the dental school for 28 years.

December 24, 2025 08:00 AM
Advanced Primary Care 2026: Top 6 Investments for Health Systems According to Harvard Medical School

Harvard Medical School's Center for Primary Care has released a comprehensive “Primary Care Investment Guide,” providing the first...

December 17, 2025 08:00 AM
Morgue manager at Harvard Medical School gets 8 years for selling the deceased

A former manager of the morgue at Harvard Medical School, along with his wife, was sentenced to prison terms for their role in transporting...

November 25, 2025 08:00 AM
Harvard Alumni Affairs Databases Breached

The University is investigating the cyberattack, which may have compromised the personal information of alumni, donors, students, faculty,...

November 21, 2025 08:00 AM
Cyberattacks’ harm to universities is growing — and so are their effects on research

Hackers are ramping up attacks on academic institutions to access valuable data and to demand ransoms.

November 04, 2025 08:00 AM
Two charged in Harvard Medical School explosion conspiracy

BOSTON (WWLP) – Two suspects have been charged in connection with an explosion on Harvard Medical School's (HMS) campus last weekend.

November 04, 2025 08:00 AM
Two men arrested over explosion at Harvard Medical School

Two Massachusetts men visiting Boston-area colleges on Halloween night when numerous parties were underway have been arrested and charged...

November 03, 2025 08:00 AM
Annual Symposium Pushes the UW, and Seattle, to Forefront of Space Diplomacy | Newswise

The 2025 Space Diplomacy Symposium at the University of Washington will be held on Nov. 7. The annual symposium, which brings together...

November 01, 2025 07:00 AM
Authorities investigating ‘intentional’ explosion at Harvard Medical School

Agencies are investigating an explosion at a Harvard Medical School building Saturday morning, which arson investigators say was...

faq

Frequently Asked Questions

Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.

HMS CyberSecurity History Information

Official Website of Harvard Medical School

The official website of Harvard Medical School is http://hms.harvard.edu.

Harvard Medical School’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score

According to Rankiteo, Harvard Medical School’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 800, reflecting their Good security posture.

How many security badges does Harvard Medical School’ have ?

According to Rankiteo, Harvard Medical School currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has Harvard Medical School been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, Harvard Medical School has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does Harvard Medical School have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Harvard Medical School is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does Harvard Medical School have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Harvard Medical School does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does Harvard Medical School comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, Harvard Medical School is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does Harvard Medical School have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Harvard Medical School does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does Harvard Medical School comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, Harvard Medical School is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does Harvard Medical School have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,Harvard Medical School is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Industry Classification of Harvard Medical School

Harvard Medical School operates primarily in the Higher Education industry.

Number of Employees at Harvard Medical School

Harvard Medical School employs approximately 11,471 people worldwide.

Subsidiaries Owned by Harvard Medical School

Harvard Medical School presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

Harvard Medical School’s LinkedIn Followers

Harvard Medical School’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 409,034 followers.

NAICS Classification of Harvard Medical School

Harvard Medical School is classified under the NAICS code 6113, which corresponds to Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools.

Harvard Medical School’s Presence on Crunchbase

No, Harvard Medical School does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Harvard Medical School’s Presence on LinkedIn

Yes, Harvard Medical School maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvard-medical-school.

Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Harvard Medical School

As of January 24, 2026, Rankiteo reports that Harvard Medical School has experienced 1 cybersecurity incidents.

Number of Peer and Competitor Companies

Harvard Medical School has an estimated 15,190 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Harvard Medical School ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Breach.

How does Harvard Medical School detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?

Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an incident response plan activated with yes, and containment measures with removed hackers' access to internal systems, and remediation measures with stepped up security protocols, and communication strategy with public statements to stakeholders..

Incident Details

Can you provide details on each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach

Title: Multiple University Data Breaches Due to Social Engineering Attacks

Description: In the past two months, the University of Pennsylvania, Harvard University, and Princeton University have fallen victim to data breaches attributed to social engineering attacks, specifically phone-based phishing. Earlier in 2025, Columbia University, Dartmouth College, and New York University also experienced similar incidents. These breaches highlight vulnerabilities in higher education cybersecurity infrastructure.

Type: Data Breach

Attack Vector: Social Engineering (Phone-based Phishing)

Vulnerability Exploited: Human error, lack of centralized IT control, decentralized IT departments

What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?

Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Breach.

How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?

Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through Phone-based phishing (social engineering).

Impact of the Incidents

What was the impact of each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845

Data Compromised: Personal data of students, faculty, and staff

Systems Affected: Internal university systems

Operational Impact: Disruption of university operations, increased security protocols

Brand Reputation Impact: Reputational damage to affected universities

Identity Theft Risk: High (potential exposure of personally identifiable information)

What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?

Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Personal data and potentially including personally identifiable information.

Which entities were affected by each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845

Entity Name: University of Pennsylvania

Entity Type: University

Industry: Higher Education

Location: United States

Size: Large

Customers Affected: Thousands of students, faculty, and staff

Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845

Entity Name: Harvard University

Entity Type: University

Industry: Higher Education

Location: United States

Size: Large

Customers Affected: Thousands of students, faculty, and staff

Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845

Entity Name: Princeton University

Entity Type: University

Industry: Higher Education

Location: United States

Size: Large

Customers Affected: Thousands of students, faculty, and staff

Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845

Entity Name: Columbia University

Entity Type: University

Industry: Higher Education

Location: United States

Size: Large

Customers Affected: Thousands of students, faculty, and staff

Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845

Entity Name: Dartmouth College

Entity Type: University

Industry: Higher Education

Location: United States

Size: Large

Customers Affected: Thousands of students, faculty, and staff

Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845

Entity Name: New York University

Entity Type: University

Industry: Higher Education

Location: United States

Size: Large

Customers Affected: Thousands of students, faculty, and staff

Response to the Incidents

What measures were taken in response to each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845

Incident Response Plan Activated: Yes

Containment Measures: Removed hackers' access to internal systems

Remediation Measures: Stepped up security protocols

Communication Strategy: Public statements to stakeholders

What is the company's incident response plan?

Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as Yes.

Data Breach Information

What type of data was compromised in each breach ?

Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845

Type of Data Compromised: Personal data, potentially including personally identifiable information

Sensitivity of Data: High (personal and potentially sensitive information)

Personally Identifiable Information: Likely (e.g., Social Security numbers, payroll data)

What measures does the company take to prevent data exfiltration ?

Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: Stepped up security protocols.

How does the company handle incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) ?

Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through by removed hackers' access to internal systems.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

What lessons were learned from each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845

Lessons Learned: Universities are highly vulnerable to cyberattacks due to decentralized IT structures, lack of centralized control, and human error. Cybersecurity training and awareness are critical but not sufficient alone. There is a need for better collaboration between IT departments and faculty to balance security with academic freedom.

What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?

Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845

Recommendations: Implement more centralized IT control to reduce vulnerabilities from decentralized departments., Enhance cybersecurity training and awareness programs, focusing on non-punitive approaches., Limit data retention to reduce the risk of exposure (e.g., avoid storing unnecessary sensitive data like Social Security numbers)., Foster partnerships between IT, security teams, and faculty to align research needs with cybersecurity protocols., Adopt adaptive security measures like behavioral WAFs and enhanced monitoring to detect and respond to threats more effectively.Implement more centralized IT control to reduce vulnerabilities from decentralized departments., Enhance cybersecurity training and awareness programs, focusing on non-punitive approaches., Limit data retention to reduce the risk of exposure (e.g., avoid storing unnecessary sensitive data like Social Security numbers)., Foster partnerships between IT, security teams, and faculty to align research needs with cybersecurity protocols., Adopt adaptive security measures like behavioral WAFs and enhanced monitoring to detect and respond to threats more effectively.Implement more centralized IT control to reduce vulnerabilities from decentralized departments., Enhance cybersecurity training and awareness programs, focusing on non-punitive approaches., Limit data retention to reduce the risk of exposure (e.g., avoid storing unnecessary sensitive data like Social Security numbers)., Foster partnerships between IT, security teams, and faculty to align research needs with cybersecurity protocols., Adopt adaptive security measures like behavioral WAFs and enhanced monitoring to detect and respond to threats more effectively.Implement more centralized IT control to reduce vulnerabilities from decentralized departments., Enhance cybersecurity training and awareness programs, focusing on non-punitive approaches., Limit data retention to reduce the risk of exposure (e.g., avoid storing unnecessary sensitive data like Social Security numbers)., Foster partnerships between IT, security teams, and faculty to align research needs with cybersecurity protocols., Adopt adaptive security measures like behavioral WAFs and enhanced monitoring to detect and respond to threats more effectively.Implement more centralized IT control to reduce vulnerabilities from decentralized departments., Enhance cybersecurity training and awareness programs, focusing on non-punitive approaches., Limit data retention to reduce the risk of exposure (e.g., avoid storing unnecessary sensitive data like Social Security numbers)., Foster partnerships between IT, security teams, and faculty to align research needs with cybersecurity protocols., Adopt adaptive security measures like behavioral WAFs and enhanced monitoring to detect and respond to threats more effectively.

What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?

Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are Universities are highly vulnerable to cyberattacks due to decentralized IT structures, lack of centralized control, and human error. Cybersecurity training and awareness are critical but not sufficient alone. There is a need for better collaboration between IT departments and faculty to balance security with academic freedom.

References

Where can I find more information about each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845

Source: Chronicle of Higher Education

Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?

Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: Chronicle of Higher Education.

Investigation Status

What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845

Investigation Status: Ongoing

How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?

Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Public statements to stakeholders.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Were there any advisories issued to stakeholders or customers for each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845

Stakeholder Advisories: Universities have issued public statements to stakeholders about the breaches and steps taken to mitigate risks.

What advisories does the company provide to stakeholders and customers following an incident ?

Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: was Universities have issued public statements to stakeholders about the breaches and steps taken to mitigate risks..

Initial Access Broker

How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845

Entry Point: Phone-based phishing (social engineering)

Post-Incident Analysis

What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845

Root Causes: Human Error (Falling For Phishing Attacks), Decentralized It Departments Creating Inconsistent Security Protocols, Lack Of Centralized Control Over Technology Use, Excessive Data Retention (E.G., Storing Social Security Numbers Unnecessarily), Faculty Resistance To It Policies Due To Perceived Restrictions On Academic Freedom,

Corrective Actions: Removing Hackers' Access To Systems, Stepping Up Security Protocols, Enhancing Cybersecurity Training For Faculty And Staff,

What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?

Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Removing Hackers' Access To Systems, Stepping Up Security Protocols, Enhancing Cybersecurity Training For Faculty And Staff, .

Additional Questions

Impact of the Incidents

What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?

Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Personal data of students, faculty and and staff.

Response to the Incidents

What containment measures were taken in the most recent incident ?

Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident was Removed hackers' access to internal systems.

Data Breach Information

What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?

Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were Personal data of students, faculty and and staff.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?

Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was Universities are highly vulnerable to cyberattacks due to decentralized IT structures, lack of centralized control, and human error. Cybersecurity training and awareness are critical but not sufficient alone. There is a need for better collaboration between IT departments and faculty to balance security with academic freedom.

What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?

Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Foster partnerships between IT, security teams, and faculty to align research needs with cybersecurity protocols., Enhance cybersecurity training and awareness programs, focusing on non-punitive approaches., Adopt adaptive security measures like behavioral WAFs and enhanced monitoring to detect and respond to threats more effectively., Implement more centralized IT control to reduce vulnerabilities from decentralized departments., Limit data retention to reduce the risk of exposure (e.g. and avoid storing unnecessary sensitive data like Social Security numbers)..

References

What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?

Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is Chronicle of Higher Education.

Investigation Status

What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?

Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Ongoing.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

What was the most recent stakeholder advisory issued ?

Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was Universities have issued public statements to stakeholders about the breaches and steps taken to mitigate risks., .

Initial Access Broker

What was the most recent entry point used by an initial access broker ?

Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was an Phone-based phishing (social engineering).

cve

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Access Data Using Our API

SubsidiaryImage

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=harvard-medical-school' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

What Do We Measure ?

revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Incident
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Finding
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Grade
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network Security

Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)

Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)

Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat Intelligence

Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Top LeftTop RightBottom LeftBottom Right
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
Users Love Us Badge