Comparison Overview
Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited

Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited
Randfontein Office Park, Randfontein , 9460, ZA
Last Update: 04/04/2026
Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited (Harmony), a world-class gold mining and exploration company, has operations and assets in South Africa and Papua New Guinea (PNG). Harmony has more than 70 years’ experience in the industry. Company assets include one open pit mine a...

BHP
171 Collins Street, Melbourne, 3000, AU
Last Update: 05/10/2026
We are supplying the resources the world needs to help build a better, clearer future. Copper for renewable energy. Potash for sustainable farming. Iron ore and metallurgical coal for the steel needed for global infrastructure and the energy transition. #FutureIsClear ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited







BHP






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Mining Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited in 2026.
Incidents vs Mining Industry Avg (This Year)
BHP has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - BHP (X = Date, Y = Severity)
BHP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited

BHP
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.