Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

HARMAN IndiaHARMAN India
VS
AppleApple
HARMAN India

HARMAN India

HARMAN INTERNATIONAL (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED Salarpuria Sattva Knowledge Court Office-1, Wing 'A' & 'B' 3rd floor, Plot No. 9, Phase I, Doddenakkundi Industrial Area, K.R. Puram Hobli, Bangalore -560048, Karnataka., Bangalore, 560103, IN

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.harman.com
773/1000Fair

HARMAN is a global leader in Lifestyle Audio and Automotive technology. We create intelligent experiences that enrich people’s lives on the road, in their homes, on the stage, and everywhere in between. Our iconic audio brands — including JBL®, Harman Kardon®, AKG®, Bow...

NAICS:334
NAICS Definition:Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing
Employees:3,107
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Apple

Apple

1 Apple Park Way, Cupertino, 95014, US

Last Update: 07/10/2026

View Profile
Between 550 and 599
http://www.apple.com/careers
562/1000Very Poor

We’re a diverse collective of thinkers and doers, continually reimagining what’s possible to help us all do what we love in new ways. And the same innovation that goes into our products also applies to our practices — strengthening our commitment to leave the world bett...

NAICS:334
NAICS Definition:Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing
Employees:194,686
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
28
Known data breaches
14
Attack type number
4

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
HARMAN India

HARMAN India

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Apple

Apple

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HARMAN India in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Apple has 2645.1% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - HARMAN India (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HARMAN India cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Apple (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Apple cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
HARMAN India

HARMAN India

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Apple

Apple

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
APP1790670237
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
APP1785997496
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
APP1786177624

FAQ

Between HARMAN India company and Apple company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between HARMAN India company and Apple company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between HARMAN India company and Apple company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between HARMAN India company and Apple company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between HARMAN India company and Apple company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between HARMAN India company and Apple company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between HARMAN India company and Apple company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between HARMAN India company and Apple company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between HARMAN India company and Apple company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between HARMAN India company and Apple company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between HARMAN India company and Apple company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between HARMAN India and Apple, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between HARMAN India and Apple, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - HARMAN India or Apple ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - HARMAN India or Apple ?
Between HARMAN India and Apple, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between HARMAN India and Apple, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA