Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Harefield EchocardiographyHarefield Echocardiography
VS
McKessonMcKesson
Harefield Echocardiography

Harefield Echocardiography

Hill End Road, Harefield , UB9 6JH, GB

Last Update: 22/02/2026

View Profile
761/1000Fair

The Echocardiography Department at Harefield Hospital holds national and international recognition for its excellent standards of clinical practice. It has been awarded advanced European accreditation by the European Association of Echocardiography. Our department spec...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
McKesson

McKesson

6555 State Highway 161, Irving, Texas, US, 75039

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile

Welcome to the official LinkedIn page for McKesson Corporation. We're an impact-driven healthcare organization dedicated to “Advancing Health Outcomes For All.” As a global healthcare company, we touch virtually every aspect of health. Our leaders empower our people to...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:24,029
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Harefield Echocardiography

Harefield Echocardiography

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
McKesson

McKesson

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Harefield Echocardiography in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for McKesson in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Harefield Echocardiography (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Harefield Echocardiography cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - McKesson (X = Date, Y = Severity)

McKesson cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Harefield Echocardiography

Harefield Echocardiography

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
McKesson

McKesson

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Harefield Echocardiography company and McKesson company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Harefield Echocardiography company and McKesson company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Harefield Echocardiography company and McKesson company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Harefield Echocardiography company and McKesson company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Harefield Echocardiography company and McKesson company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Harefield Echocardiography company and McKesson company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Harefield Echocardiography company and McKesson company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Harefield Echocardiography company and McKesson company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Harefield Echocardiography company and McKesson company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Harefield Echocardiography company and McKesson company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Harefield Echocardiography company and McKesson company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Harefield Echocardiography and McKesson, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Harefield Echocardiography and McKesson, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Harefield Echocardiography or McKesson ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Harefield Echocardiography or McKesson ?
Between Harefield Echocardiography and McKesson, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Harefield Echocardiography and McKesson, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2