Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Harcourts Real EstateHarcourts Real Estate
VS
Keller Williams Realty, LLCKeller Williams Realty, LLC
Harcourts Real Estate

Harcourts Real Estate

31 Amy Johnson Pl, Eagle Farm, 4009, AU

Last Update: 18/06/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://harcourts.net/au
665/1000Weak

In an increasingly fast-paced world, we know that while people want the most professional efficient service, they still prize the fundamentals of honesty and integrity from real estate consultants committed to achieving their clients’ goals. That’s why at Harcourts we...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:4,677
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
3
Keller Williams Realty, LLC

Keller Williams Realty, LLC

Suite 400, Austin, TX, US, 78746

Last Update: 10/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://headquarters.kw.com/
800/1000Good

Austin, Texas-based Keller Williams, the world’s largest real estate franchise by agent count, has more than 1,100 offices and 176,000 agents. The franchise is also No. 1 in units and sales volume in the United States. Since 1983, the company has cultivated an agent-c...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:102,888
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Harcourts Real Estate

Harcourts Real Estate

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Keller Williams Realty, LLC

Keller Williams Realty, LLC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)

Harcourts Real Estate has 12.99% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Keller Williams Realty, LLC in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Harcourts Real Estate (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Harcourts Real Estate cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Keller Williams Realty, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Keller Williams Realty, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Harcourts Real Estate

Harcourts Real Estate

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
HAR1781821433
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
NISCHEHAR1780929039
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
HAR221321222
Keller Williams Realty, LLC

Keller Williams Realty, LLC

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
KEL020091825

FAQ

Between Harcourts Real Estate company and Keller Williams Realty, LLC company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Harcourts Real Estate company and Keller Williams Realty, LLC company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Harcourts Real Estate company and Keller Williams Realty, LLC company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Harcourts Real Estate company and Keller Williams Realty, LLC company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Harcourts Real Estate company and Keller Williams Realty, LLC company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Harcourts Real Estate company and Keller Williams Realty, LLC company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Harcourts Real Estate company and Keller Williams Realty, LLC company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Harcourts Real Estate company and Keller Williams Realty, LLC company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Harcourts Real Estate company and Keller Williams Realty, LLC company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Harcourts Real Estate company and Keller Williams Realty, LLC company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Harcourts Real Estate company and Keller Williams Realty, LLC company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Harcourts Real Estate and Keller Williams Realty, LLC, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Harcourts Real Estate and Keller Williams Realty, LLC, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Harcourts Real Estate or Keller Williams Realty, LLC ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Harcourts Real Estate or Keller Williams Realty, LLC ?
Between Harcourts Real Estate and Keller Williams Realty, LLC, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Harcourts Real Estate and Keller Williams Realty, LLC, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-90461
SUMMARY

OpenStack Ironic through 38.0.0 may send a username and password to an unexpected remote host when Image Service is configured for HTTP(S) Basic Authentication.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-90460
SUMMARY

An issue was discovered in OpenStack Keystone before 29.0.3. Tokens obtained via delegated authentication methods (EC2 credentials, application credentials, OAuth1 access tokens, and trusts) are not blocked from creating, modifying, or deleting credentials via the /v3/credentials API. EC2-derived tokens can additionally read credential blobs, exposing TOTP MFA seeds and other secrets. Also, PATCH /v3/credentials does not validate the requested post-update project_id, allowing any delegated token to move a credential to an unauthorized project. All Keystone deployments using delegated authentication are affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90457
SUMMARY

The administrative password is hashed using a comparatively weak, fast algorithm for the credential store backing one authentication path, and the file containing that hash is written with permissions allowing it to be read by any local user. This is inconsistent with a separate, stronger hashing algorithm used for the same password on another authentication path. A party able to read this file, including a local user or a party with access to a configuration backup, could feasibly recover the underlying password through offline computation, compromising the administrative credential across every path that accepts it.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90456
SUMMARY

An example environment-configuration file for a bundled inventory-management component ships with a fixed, publicly-known administrative password. A deployment that copies this example file into active configuration without running the setup routine that regenerates credentials will expose that component's administrative interface to anyone aware of the default value.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90455
SUMMARY

A prior update that raised a bundled HTTP client library to a version remediating known vulnerabilities was later reverted, reintroducing the earlier, vulnerable version into a log-processing component. The only code path in that component using the library issues a request to a single fixed, trusted vendor URL at initialization and does not process attacker-controlled input through the library, limiting practical exploitability of the reintroduced version in this context.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA