Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Hapag-Lloyd CruisesHapag-Lloyd Cruises
VS
Royal Caribbean GroupRoyal Caribbean Group
Hapag-Lloyd Cruises

Hapag-Lloyd Cruises

Heidenkamspweg 58, Hamburg, 20097, DE

Last Update: 23/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.hl-cruises.de
761/1000Fair

Hapag-Lloyd Cruises gilt im deutschsprachigen Raum als führende Kreuzfahrtmarke im Luxus- und Expeditionsbereich. Zur Flotte gehören aktuell fünf Schiffe. Unsere Schiffe sind klein, individuell und herausragend in ihrer Klasse: Die weltweit besten Luxusschiffe EUROPA u...

NAICS:5615
NAICS Definition:Travel Arrangement and Reservation Services
Employees:487
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Royal Caribbean Group

Royal Caribbean Group

Royal Caribbean Group 1050 Caribbean Way Miami, Miami, Florida, US, 2312

Last Update: 17/09/2026

View Profile
812/1000Good

At Royal Caribbean Group, we deliver unforgettable vacations to guests who trust us with life’s greatest moments. We build the best ships, and even better careers, all while doing the right thing. We are passionate. We are innovative. We are unstoppable. We open the wor...

NAICS:5615
NAICS Definition:Travel Arrangement and Reservation Services
Employees:44,482
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Hapag-Lloyd Cruises

Hapag-Lloyd Cruises

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Royal Caribbean Group

Royal Caribbean Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Travel Arrangements Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hapag-Lloyd Cruises in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Travel Arrangements Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Royal Caribbean Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Hapag-Lloyd Cruises (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hapag-Lloyd Cruises cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Royal Caribbean Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Royal Caribbean Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Hapag-Lloyd Cruises

Hapag-Lloyd Cruises

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Royal Caribbean Group

Royal Caribbean Group

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ROY1011090725

FAQ

Between Hapag-Lloyd Cruises company and Royal Caribbean Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Hapag-Lloyd Cruises company and Royal Caribbean Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Hapag-Lloyd Cruises company and Royal Caribbean Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Hapag-Lloyd Cruises company and Royal Caribbean Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Hapag-Lloyd Cruises company and Royal Caribbean Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Hapag-Lloyd Cruises company and Royal Caribbean Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Hapag-Lloyd Cruises company and Royal Caribbean Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Hapag-Lloyd Cruises company and Royal Caribbean Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Hapag-Lloyd Cruises company and Royal Caribbean Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Hapag-Lloyd Cruises company and Royal Caribbean Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Hapag-Lloyd Cruises company and Royal Caribbean Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Hapag-Lloyd Cruises and Royal Caribbean Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Hapag-Lloyd Cruises and Royal Caribbean Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Hapag-Lloyd Cruises or Royal Caribbean Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Hapag-Lloyd Cruises or Royal Caribbean Group ?
Between Hapag-Lloyd Cruises and Royal Caribbean Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Hapag-Lloyd Cruises and Royal Caribbean Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97032
SUMMARY

HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97031
SUMMARY

Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97030
SUMMARY

A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96207
SUMMARY

Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94510
SUMMARY

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9