Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Hanover County Public SchoolsHanover County Public Schools
VS
Bright HorizonsBright Horizons
Hanover County Public Schools

Hanover County Public Schools

200 Berkley St, Ashland, 23005, US

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.hcps.us/
740/1000Moderate

Hanover County Public Schools (HCPS) is an award-winning school division that serves approximately 17,000 students in Pre-K–12 across 24 schools. These include 14 elementary, four middle, and four high schools, as well as one trade and technology and one alternative edu...

NAICS:92311
NAICS Definition:Administration of Education Programs
Employees:1,718
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Bright Horizons

Bright Horizons

2 Wells Avenue, Newton, 02459, US

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
778/1000Fair

More than 1,000 top employers trust Bright Horizons® (NYSE: BFAM) for proven solutions that support employees, advance careers, and maximize performance. From on-site child care that amplify your culture, back-up care to handle disruptions, and education programs that b...

NAICS:92311
NAICS Definition:Administration of Education Programs
Employees:14,110
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Hanover County Public Schools

Hanover County Public Schools

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Bright Horizons

Bright Horizons

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Education Administration Programs Industry Avg (This Year)

Hanover County Public Schools has 43.82% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Education Administration Programs Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bright Horizons in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Hanover County Public Schools (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hanover County Public Schools cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Bright Horizons (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bright Horizons cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Hanover County Public Schools

Hanover County Public Schools

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
HAN1773368680
Bright Horizons

Bright Horizons

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Hanover County Public Schools company and Bright Horizons company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Hanover County Public Schools company and Bright Horizons company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Hanover County Public Schools company and Bright Horizons company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Hanover County Public Schools company and Bright Horizons company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Hanover County Public Schools company and Bright Horizons company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Hanover County Public Schools company and Bright Horizons company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Hanover County Public Schools company and Bright Horizons company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Hanover County Public Schools company and Bright Horizons company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Hanover County Public Schools company and Bright Horizons company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Hanover County Public Schools company and Bright Horizons company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Hanover County Public Schools company and Bright Horizons company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Hanover County Public Schools and Bright Horizons, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Hanover County Public Schools and Bright Horizons, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Hanover County Public Schools or Bright Horizons ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Hanover County Public Schools or Bright Horizons ?
Between Hanover County Public Schools and Bright Horizons, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Hanover County Public Schools and Bright Horizons, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2