Comparison Overview
Hammer Enterprise

Hammer Enterprise
Hammer Distribution, Ashwood, Chineham Business Park, Basingstoke, GB, RG24 8EH
Last Update: 21/04/2026
Hammer Enterprise is where depth meets delivery. We provide specialist distribution and consultancy across servers, storage, networking, infrastructure, and components — the backbone of enterprise IT. Our approach goes beyond supply. With dedicated technical teams, stro...

Western Digital
5601 Great Oaks Parkway, San Jose, CA, US, 95138
Last Update: 03/04/2026
At Western Digital, our vision is to unleash the power and value of data. For decades, we have been at the forefront of storage innovation, which fuels our mission to be the market leader in data storage, delivering solutions for now and the future. We are committed to ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Hammer Enterprise







Western Digital






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Computer Hardware Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Hammer Enterprise in 2026.
Incidents vs Computer Hardware Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Western Digital in 2026.
Incident History - Hammer Enterprise (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Hammer Enterprise cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Western Digital (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Western Digital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Hammer Enterprise

Western Digital
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.