Comparison Overview
Hammer Enterprise

Hammer Enterprise
Hammer Distribution, Ashwood, Chineham Business Park, Basingstoke, GB, RG24 8EH
Last Update: 21/04/2026
Hammer Enterprise is where depth meets delivery. We provide specialist distribution and consultancy across servers, storage, networking, infrastructure, and components — the backbone of enterprise IT. Our approach goes beyond supply. With dedicated technical teams, stro...

ASUS
No.15, Lide Road, Taipei City, 112, TW
Last Update: 23/05/2026
ASUS is a global technology leader delivering incredible experiences that enhance the lives of people everywhere. World renowned for continuously reimagining today’s technologies for tomorrow, ASUS puts users first In Search of Incredible to provide the world’s most inn...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Hammer Enterprise







ASUS






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Computer Hardware Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Hammer Enterprise in 2026.
Incidents vs Computer Hardware Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
ASUS has 277.36% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Hammer Enterprise (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Hammer Enterprise cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - ASUS (X = Date, Y = Severity)
ASUS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Hammer Enterprise

ASUS
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.