Comparison Overview
Hamline University Career Development Center

Hamline University Career Development Center
1536 Hewitt Ave, St Paul, 55104, US
Last Update: 30/03/2026
The professional & career services department of Hamline University. Whom we serve: - All Hamline undergraduate students - Graduate students in the School of Education and Leadership or Creative Writing programs - Alums within three years of their graduation date (ful...

University of Alabama at Birmingham
Administration Bldg Suite 1070, BIRMINGHAM, 35294-0110, US
Last Update: 13/09/2026
Known for its innovative and interdisciplinary approach to education at both the graduate and undergraduate levels, the University of Alabama at Birmingham, a part of the University of Alabama System, is an internationally renowned research university and academic medic...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Hamline University Career Development Center







University of Alabama at Birmingham






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Hamline University Career Development Center in 2026.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for University of Alabama at Birmingham in 2026.
Incident History - Hamline University Career Development Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Hamline University Career Development Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - University of Alabama at Birmingham (X = Date, Y = Severity)
University of Alabama at Birmingham cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Hamline University Career Development Center

University of Alabama at Birmingham
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.