Halifax vs Capitec-bank - Cyber Risk Comparison & Security Rating

Comparison Overview

Halifax

Capitec

Halifax

N/A

Last Update: 20/03/2026

View Profile

Between 800 and 849

http://www.halifax.co.uk

815/1000Good

At the Halifax we've been helping our customers since 1853. Whether buying a home or saving for a rainy day, we’ll help you with all your everyday banking needs. With every branch open Monday to Saturday, 24/7 Online and Mobile Banking, and easy to use Telephone Bankin...

NAICS:52211

NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking

Employees:4,492

Subsidiaries:10

12-month incidents

Known data breaches

Attack type number

Capitec

5 Neutron Road, Stellenbosch, Western Cape, ZA, 7600

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile

Between 800 and 849

http://www.capitecbank.co.za

802/1000Good

Imagine simple, affordable banking solutions that work for you – just like it does for over 25 million South Africans. They’re banking smart, paying less and getting more value every day with us. As the country’s leading digital bank, we’re proud to have been voted th...

NAICS:52211

NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking

Employees:22,087

Subsidiaries:0

12-month incidents

Known data breaches

Attack type number

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category

Halifax

ISO 27001Not verified

SOC2 Type 1Not verified

SOC2 Type 2Not verified

GDPRNot verified

PCI DSSNot verified

HIPAANot verified

Capitec

ISO 27001Not verified

SOC2 Type 1Not verified

SOC2 Type 2Not verified

GDPRNot verified

PCI DSSNot verified

HIPAANot verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

Halifax has 37.89% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Capitec in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Halifax (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Halifax cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware

C - Cyber Attack

D - Data Breach

V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Capitec (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Capitec cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available

R - Ransomware

C - Cyber Attack

D - Data Breach

V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...

Halifax

Incidents

🔒 Incident : Breach

HALLLO1773312505

Capitec

Incidents

No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Halifax company and Capitec company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?

Between Halifax company and Capitec company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?

Between Halifax company and Capitec company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?

Between Halifax company and Capitec company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?

Between Halifax company and Capitec company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?

Between Halifax company and Capitec company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?

Between Halifax company and Capitec company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?

Between Halifax company and Capitec company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?

Between Halifax company and Capitec company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?

Between Halifax company and Capitec company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?

Between Halifax company and Capitec company, which one has the largest number of employees ?

Between Halifax and Capitec, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?

Between Halifax and Capitec, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?

Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Halifax or Capitec ?

Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Halifax or Capitec ?

Between Halifax and Capitec, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?

Between Halifax and Capitec, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-96451

SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in Ultimate Member Ultimate Member ultimate-member allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects Ultimate Member: from n/a through 2.13.1.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-10-03

UPDATED

Date2026-10-03

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)

CVSS3

Base Score: 8.8

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

IMPACT SCORE

5.9

EXPLOITABILITY

2.8

REFERENCES

https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/ultimate-member/vulnerability/wordpress-ultimate-member-plugin-2-13-1-privilege-escalation-vulnerability?_s_id=cve

CVE-2026-103342

SUMMARY

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Unlimited Elements Unlimited Elements For Elementor (Free Widgets, Addons, Templates) unlimited-elements-for-elementor allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects Unlimited Elements For Elementor (Free Widgets, Addons, Templates): from n/a through 2.0.20.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-10-03

UPDATED

Date2026-10-03

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)

CVSS3

Base Score: 7.1

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

IMPACT SCORE

3.7

EXPLOITABILITY

2.8

REFERENCES

https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/unlimited-elements-for-elementor/vulnerability/wordpress-unlimited-elements-for-elementor-free-widgets-addons-templates-plugin-2-0-20-cross-site-scripting-xss-vulnerability?_s_id=cve

CVE-2026-103065

SUMMARY

Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input vulnerability in Themeum Kirki kirki allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.This issue affects Kirki: from n/a through 6.3.1.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-10-03

UPDATED

Date2026-10-03

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)

CVSS3

Base Score: 8.2

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N

IMPACT SCORE

4.2

EXPLOITABILITY

3.9

REFERENCES

https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/kirki/vulnerability/wordpress-kirki-plugin-6-3-1-arbitrary-code-execution-vulnerability?_s_id=cve

CVE-2026-105122

SUMMARY

OpenAM before 16.1.3 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers able to register or modify OAuth 2.0 clients to make OpenAM fetch internal resources via an unvalidated jwks_uri. Attackers can trigger unauthenticated fetches through client-authentication and ID-token validation to probe internal hosts, metadata endpoints or local files, or exhaust request threads for denial of service.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-10-03

UPDATED

Date2026-10-03

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)

CVSS3

Base Score: 5.4

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L

CVSS4

Base Score: 5.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

IMPACT SCORE

2.5

EXPLOITABILITY

2.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-105121

SUMMARY

OpenAM before 16.1.3 contains an improper authorization vulnerability that allows delegated administrators to destroy sessions outside their realms because realm checks use the requester's realm. Authenticated accounts holding the iplanet-am-session-destroy-sessions attribute can supply a target session identifier or handle to forcibly log out users in any realm.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-10-03

UPDATED

Date2026-10-03

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.9)

CVSS3

Base Score: 4.9

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

CVSS4

Base Score: 6.9

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

IMPACT SCORE

3.6

EXPLOITABILITY

1.2

REFERENCES