Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

HagemeyerHagemeyer
VS
METRO/MAKROMETRO/MAKRO
Hagemeyer

Hagemeyer

AU

Last Update: 23/01/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.hagemeyer.com
824/1000Good

NAICS:42
NAICS Definition:Wholesale Trade
Employees:333
Subsidiaries:26
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
METRO/MAKRO

METRO/MAKRO

Metro-Str. 1, Duesseldorf, 40235, DE

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://careers.metroag.de
781/1000Fair

METRO is a leading international wholesale company with food and non-food assortments that specialises in serving the needs of hotels, restaurants and caterers (HoReCa) as well as independent traders. Around the world, METRO has 15 million customers who can choose wheth...

NAICS:42
NAICS Definition:Wholesale Trade
Employees:27,429
Subsidiaries:22
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Hagemeyer

Hagemeyer

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
METRO/MAKRO

METRO/MAKRO

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Wholesale Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hagemeyer in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Wholesale Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for METRO/MAKRO in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Hagemeyer (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hagemeyer cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - METRO/MAKRO (X = Date, Y = Severity)

METRO/MAKRO cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Hagemeyer

Hagemeyer

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
METRO/MAKRO

METRO/MAKRO

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Hagemeyer company and METRO/MAKRO company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Hagemeyer company and METRO/MAKRO company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Hagemeyer company and METRO/MAKRO company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Hagemeyer company and METRO/MAKRO company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Hagemeyer company and METRO/MAKRO company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Hagemeyer company and METRO/MAKRO company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Hagemeyer company and METRO/MAKRO company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Hagemeyer company and METRO/MAKRO company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Hagemeyer company and METRO/MAKRO company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Hagemeyer company and METRO/MAKRO company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Hagemeyer company and METRO/MAKRO company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Hagemeyer and METRO/MAKRO, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Hagemeyer and METRO/MAKRO, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Hagemeyer or METRO/MAKRO ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Hagemeyer or METRO/MAKRO ?
Between Hagemeyer and METRO/MAKRO, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Hagemeyer and METRO/MAKRO, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1