Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

המרכז האקדמי הרב תחומי ירושליםהמרכז האקדמי הרב תחומי ירושלים
VS
Florida State UniversityFlorida State University
המרכז האקדמי הרב תחומי ירושלים

המרכז האקדמי הרב תחומי ירושלים

Haneviim 37, Jerusalem, undefined, 91010, IL

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 850 and 899
http://Www.jmc.ac.il
850/1000Very Good

על המרכז האקדמי הרב תחומי ירושלים המרכז האקדמי הרב תחומי ירושלים הינו מוסד אקדמי מוכר ע"י המועצה להשכלה גבוהה. המרכז נוסד על ידי ארגון נשות הדסה תחת השם "המכללה האקדמית הדסה" בשנת 1996. במשך שנים רבות ארגון נשות הדסה תמך במכללה. בשנת 2024 החליטו הצדדים כי דרכיהם ייפרדו ...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:441
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Florida State University

Florida State University

222 S. Copeland Street, Tallahassee, fl, US, 32306-1037

Last Update: 30/06/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://news.fsu.edu
801/1000Good

Florida State University offers a unique academic environment built on our cherished values, distinctive heritage, and welcoming campus. Florida State has it all, offering nationally-ranked academics, world-renowned faculty, championship athletics, and a prime location ...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:15,623
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
המרכז האקדמי הרב תחומי ירושלים

המרכז האקדמי הרב תחומי ירושלים

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Florida State University

Florida State University

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for המרכז האקדמי הרב תחומי ירושלים in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Florida State University in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - המרכז האקדמי הרב תחומי ירושלים (X = Date, Y = Severity)

המרכז האקדמי הרב תחומי ירושלים cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Florida State University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Florida State University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
המרכז האקדמי הרב תחומי ירושלים

המרכז האקדמי הרב תחומי ירושלים

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Florida State University

Florida State University

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
COLE-EFLOSOLKAS1782779791

FAQ

Between המרכז האקדמי הרב תחומי ירושלים company and Florida State University company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between המרכז האקדמי הרב תחומי ירושלים company and Florida State University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between המרכז האקדמי הרב תחומי ירושלים company and Florida State University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between המרכז האקדמי הרב תחומי ירושלים company and Florida State University company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between המרכז האקדמי הרב תחומי ירושלים company and Florida State University company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between המרכז האקדמי הרב תחומי ירושלים company and Florida State University company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between המרכז האקדמי הרב תחומי ירושלים company and Florida State University company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between המרכז האקדמי הרב תחומי ירושלים company and Florida State University company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between המרכז האקדמי הרב תחומי ירושלים company and Florida State University company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between המרכז האקדמי הרב תחומי ירושלים company and Florida State University company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between המרכז האקדמי הרב תחומי ירושלים company and Florida State University company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between המרכז האקדמי הרב תחומי ירושלים and Florida State University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between המרכז האקדמי הרב תחומי ירושלים and Florida State University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - המרכז האקדמי הרב תחומי ירושלים or Florida State University ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - המרכז האקדמי הרב תחומי ירושלים or Florida State University ?
Between המרכז האקדמי הרב תחומי ירושלים and Florida State University, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between המרכז האקדמי הרב תחומי ירושלים and Florida State University, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2