Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Hactl - Hong Kong Air Cargo Terminals LimitedHactl - Hong Kong Air Cargo Terminals Limited
VS
DelhiveryDelhivery
Hactl - Hong Kong Air Cargo Terminals Limited

Hactl - Hong Kong Air Cargo Terminals Limited

SuperTerminal One, Hong Kong, HK

Last Update: 25/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.hactl.com
752/1000Fair

Launched in 1976, Hong Kong Air Cargo Terminals Limited (Hactl) is Hong Kong’s largest independent cargo handler, serving more than 100 airline companies and 1,000 freight forwarders. Hactl built, owns and operates SuperTerminal 1, the single largest multi-level air ca...

NAICS:47
NAICS Definition:Transportation and Warehousing
Employees:374
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Delhivery

Delhivery

Plot 5,sector 44, Gurgaon, Haryana, IN, 122002

Last Update: 26/06/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.delhivery.com/
754/1000Fair

Delhivery is India’s largest fully-integrated logistics services provider. With a nationwide network spanning over 18,850 pin codes, the company offers a comprehensive range of logistics solutions — including express parcel transportation, partial-truckload (PTL) and fu...

NAICS:47
NAICS Definition:Transportation and Warehousing
Employees:30,999
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Hactl - Hong Kong Air Cargo Terminals Limited

Hactl - Hong Kong Air Cargo Terminals Limited

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Delhivery

Delhivery

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hactl - Hong Kong Air Cargo Terminals Limited in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Delhivery in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Hactl - Hong Kong Air Cargo Terminals Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hactl - Hong Kong Air Cargo Terminals Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Delhivery (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Delhivery cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Hactl - Hong Kong Air Cargo Terminals Limited

Hactl - Hong Kong Air Cargo Terminals Limited

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Delhivery

Delhivery

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
MINDEL1766563271

FAQ

Between Hactl - Hong Kong Air Cargo Terminals Limited company and Delhivery company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Hactl - Hong Kong Air Cargo Terminals Limited company and Delhivery company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Hactl - Hong Kong Air Cargo Terminals Limited company and Delhivery company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Hactl - Hong Kong Air Cargo Terminals Limited company and Delhivery company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Hactl - Hong Kong Air Cargo Terminals Limited company and Delhivery company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Hactl - Hong Kong Air Cargo Terminals Limited company and Delhivery company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Hactl - Hong Kong Air Cargo Terminals Limited company and Delhivery company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Hactl - Hong Kong Air Cargo Terminals Limited company and Delhivery company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Hactl - Hong Kong Air Cargo Terminals Limited company and Delhivery company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Hactl - Hong Kong Air Cargo Terminals Limited company and Delhivery company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Hactl - Hong Kong Air Cargo Terminals Limited company and Delhivery company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Hactl - Hong Kong Air Cargo Terminals Limited and Delhivery, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Hactl - Hong Kong Air Cargo Terminals Limited and Delhivery, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Hactl - Hong Kong Air Cargo Terminals Limited or Delhivery ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Hactl - Hong Kong Air Cargo Terminals Limited or Delhivery ?
Between Hactl - Hong Kong Air Cargo Terminals Limited and Delhivery, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Hactl - Hong Kong Air Cargo Terminals Limited and Delhivery, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8