Comparison Overview
Hackensack Public Schools

Hackensack Public Schools
191 2nd St, Hackensack, 07601, US
Last Update: 03/08/2026
The Hackensack Public Schools are a comprehensive community public school district that serves students in pre-kindergarten through twelfth grade from the City of Hackensack, in Bergen County, New Jersey, United States. As of the 2019-20 school year, the district and i...

Austin Independent School District
4000 S I H 35, Austin, 78704, US
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Austin ISD is a diverse community of more than 10,000 employees, and we recognize that nothing is more essential to a great education system than innovative, talented, passionate educators. Whether you’re a recent graduate or an experienced professional seeking a new ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Hackensack Public Schools







Austin Independent School District






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Primary and Secondary Education Industry Avg (This Year)
Hackensack Public Schools has 20.0% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Primary and Secondary Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Austin Independent School District in 2026.
Incident History - Hackensack Public Schools (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Hackensack Public Schools cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Austin Independent School District (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Austin Independent School District cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Hackensack Public Schools

Austin Independent School District
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.