Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Hach MalaysiaHach Malaysia
VS
SUEZSUEZ
Hach Malaysia

Hach Malaysia

Surian Tower, Unit 23A, 23A Floor, No 1, Jalan PJU 7/3, Mutiara Damansara, , Petaling Jaya, 47810, MY

Last Update: 11/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://my.hach.com/
753/1000Fair

Hach Malaysia Sdn Bhd, established in October 2020, serves as the primary hub for selling and distributing Hach Company’s products in Malaysia. Hach products are designed to simplify analysis by offering sophisticated on-line instrumentation, accurate portable laborator...

NAICS:54162
NAICS Definition:Environmental Consulting Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:43
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
SUEZ

SUEZ

La Défense, Paris, 92040, FR

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.suez.com
797/1000Fair

We provide essential services in the water and waste sectors to preserve resources and improve quality of life wherever we operate. As a global player for over 160 years, we support public and private actors with resilient and innovative solutions. With a presence in ...

NAICS:54162
NAICS Definition:Environmental Consulting Services
Employees:26,444
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Hach Malaysia

Hach Malaysia

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
SUEZ

SUEZ

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hach Malaysia in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SUEZ in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Hach Malaysia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hach Malaysia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - SUEZ (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SUEZ cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Hach Malaysia

Hach Malaysia

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
SUEZ

SUEZ

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Hach Malaysia company and SUEZ company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Hach Malaysia company and SUEZ company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Hach Malaysia company and SUEZ company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Hach Malaysia company and SUEZ company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Hach Malaysia company and SUEZ company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Hach Malaysia company and SUEZ company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Hach Malaysia company and SUEZ company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Hach Malaysia company and SUEZ company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Hach Malaysia company and SUEZ company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Hach Malaysia company and SUEZ company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Hach Malaysia company and SUEZ company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Hach Malaysia and SUEZ, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Hach Malaysia and SUEZ, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Hach Malaysia or SUEZ ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Hach Malaysia or SUEZ ?
Between Hach Malaysia and SUEZ, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Hach Malaysia and SUEZ, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA