Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Hach Korea (하크코리아)Hach Korea (하크코리아)
VS
SUEZSUEZ
Hach Korea (하크코리아)

Hach Korea (하크코리아)

5, Yeongdong-daero 106-gil, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, KR

Last Update: 15/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://kr.hach.com/
752/1000Fair

하크(Hach)는 수질 계측 및 분석 분야의 글로벌 리더로, 1942년 미국 아이오와 주에서 설립되었습니다. 독일에서 1933년 설립된 랑게(Lange)와 지난 2004년 합병하여 종합적인 수질 분석 라인업을 갖출 수 있게 되었습니다. 하크(Hach) 제품은 여러 수입 채널을 통해 국내 관공서 및 산업현장에 수십 년 전부터 사용되어 왔으며, 국내 지사인 하크코리아는 지난 2016년 설립되었습니다. 하크(Hach)는 Veralto의 환경 및 적용 솔루션 분야를 대표하는 Water...

NAICS:54162
NAICS Definition:Environmental Consulting Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:43
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
SUEZ

SUEZ

La Défense, Paris, 92040, FR

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.suez.com
797/1000Fair

We provide essential services in the water and waste sectors to preserve resources and improve quality of life wherever we operate. As a global player for over 160 years, we support public and private actors with resilient and innovative solutions. With a presence in ...

NAICS:54162
NAICS Definition:Environmental Consulting Services
Employees:26,444
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Hach Korea (하크코리아)

Hach Korea (하크코리아)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
SUEZ

SUEZ

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hach Korea (하크코리아) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SUEZ in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Hach Korea (하크코리아) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hach Korea (하크코리아) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - SUEZ (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SUEZ cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Hach Korea (하크코리아)

Hach Korea (하크코리아)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
SUEZ

SUEZ

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Hach Korea (하크코리아) company and SUEZ company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Hach Korea (하크코리아) company and SUEZ company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Hach Korea (하크코리아) company and SUEZ company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Hach Korea (하크코리아) company and SUEZ company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Hach Korea (하크코리아) company and SUEZ company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Hach Korea (하크코리아) company and SUEZ company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Hach Korea (하크코리아) company and SUEZ company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Hach Korea (하크코리아) company and SUEZ company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Hach Korea (하크코리아) company and SUEZ company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Hach Korea (하크코리아) company and SUEZ company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Hach Korea (하크코리아) company and SUEZ company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Hach Korea (하크코리아) and SUEZ, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Hach Korea (하크코리아) and SUEZ, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Hach Korea (하크코리아) or SUEZ ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Hach Korea (하크코리아) or SUEZ ?
Between Hach Korea (하크코리아) and SUEZ, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Hach Korea (하크코리아) and SUEZ, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97032
SUMMARY

HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97031
SUMMARY

Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97030
SUMMARY

A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96207
SUMMARY

Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94510
SUMMARY

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9