Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Hach Korea (하크코리아)Hach Korea (하크코리아)
VS
Grupo TragsaGrupo Tragsa
Hach Korea (하크코리아)

Hach Korea (하크코리아)

5, Yeongdong-daero 106-gil, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, KR

Last Update: 15/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://kr.hach.com/
752/1000Fair

하크(Hach)는 수질 계측 및 분석 분야의 글로벌 리더로, 1942년 미국 아이오와 주에서 설립되었습니다. 독일에서 1933년 설립된 랑게(Lange)와 지난 2004년 합병하여 종합적인 수질 분석 라인업을 갖출 수 있게 되었습니다. 하크(Hach) 제품은 여러 수입 채널을 통해 국내 관공서 및 산업현장에 수십 년 전부터 사용되어 왔으며, 국내 지사인 하크코리아는 지난 2016년 설립되었습니다. 하크(Hach)는 Veralto의 환경 및 적용 솔루션 분야를 대표하는 Water...

NAICS:54162
NAICS Definition:Environmental Consulting Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:43
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Grupo Tragsa

Grupo Tragsa

C/ Maldonado 58, Madrid, ES, 28006

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.tragsa.es
773/1000Fair

Tragsa Group is a group of public companies, integrated in the State Industrial Ownership Corporation (SEPI), which has become a full service supplier and a reference company to Public Administrations. It is formed by four enterprises: Tragsa (1977) responsible for wor...

NAICS:54162
NAICS Definition:Environmental Consulting Services
Employees:11,674
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Hach Korea (하크코리아)

Hach Korea (하크코리아)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Grupo Tragsa

Grupo Tragsa

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hach Korea (하크코리아) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grupo Tragsa in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Hach Korea (하크코리아) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hach Korea (하크코리아) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Grupo Tragsa (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grupo Tragsa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Hach Korea (하크코리아)

Hach Korea (하크코리아)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Grupo Tragsa

Grupo Tragsa

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Hach Korea (하크코리아) company and Grupo Tragsa company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Hach Korea (하크코리아) company and Grupo Tragsa company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Hach Korea (하크코리아) company and Grupo Tragsa company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Hach Korea (하크코리아) company and Grupo Tragsa company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Hach Korea (하크코리아) company and Grupo Tragsa company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Hach Korea (하크코리아) company and Grupo Tragsa company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Hach Korea (하크코리아) company and Grupo Tragsa company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Hach Korea (하크코리아) company and Grupo Tragsa company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Hach Korea (하크코리아) company and Grupo Tragsa company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Hach Korea (하크코리아) company and Grupo Tragsa company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Hach Korea (하크코리아) company and Grupo Tragsa company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Hach Korea (하크코리아) and Grupo Tragsa, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Hach Korea (하크코리아) and Grupo Tragsa, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Hach Korea (하크코리아) or Grupo Tragsa ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Hach Korea (하크코리아) or Grupo Tragsa ?
Between Hach Korea (하크코리아) and Grupo Tragsa, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Hach Korea (하크코리아) and Grupo Tragsa, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59705
SUMMARY

mem0's openmemory/api component contains an unauthenticated access vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to read, write, and delete arbitrary user memories by accessing API routers registered without authentication middleware. Attackers can supply arbitrary user_id parameters or directly access memory retrieval endpoints to expose private memory content, or invoke pause endpoints with global_pause=true to cause denial-of-service across all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-07
UPDATED
Date2026-07-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59704
SUMMARY

Cap's GET /api/video/ai endpoint fails to validate user ownership or membership before returning private video AI metadata including titles, summaries, and chapters. Authenticated attackers can supply arbitrary video IDs to read sensitive AI-generated content and trigger unauthorized AI generation that consumes the video owner's credits without consent.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-07
UPDATED
Date2026-07-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-55078
SUMMARY

Coder allows organizations to provision remote development environments via Terraform. Starting in version 2.17.0 and prior to versions 2.29.7, 2.32.7, 2.33.8, and 2.34.2, `POST /api/v2/files` converts zip uploads to tar in memory via `CreateTarFromZip`, which enforced a per-entry size limit but no aggregate limit on total decompressed output, writing to an unbounded in-memory buffer. Exploitation requires authenticated file-upload access and the impact is limited to availability (denial of service). The fix in versions 2.29.7, 2.32.7, 2.33.8, and 2.34.2 adds a metadata preflight check that sums projected entry sizes and a streaming writer that enforces the aggregate limit during decompression. As a workaround, restrict file-upload permissions to trusted users or place a reverse proxy with request-body size limits in front of `coderd`.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-07
UPDATED
Date2026-07-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-55077
SUMMARY

Coder allows organizations to provision remote development environments via Terraform. Prior to versions 2.29.7, 2.32.7, 2.33.8, and 2.34.2, the `PUT /api/v2/users/{user}/password` endpoint authorized only `ActionUpdatePersonal` and did not prevent a `user-admin` from resetting an `owner` account's password. It also did not require the current password when an admin reset another user's password. Exploitation requires the privileged `user-admin` role so practical risk is limited to deployments that grant `user-admin` to less trusted operators. The fix in versions 2.29.7, 2.32.7, 2.33.8, and 2.34.2 prevents non-owner users from resetting the password of an account that holds the `owner` role. As a workaround, restrict the `user-admin` role to trusted administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-07
UPDATED
Date2026-07-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
CVE-2026-55076
SUMMARY

Coder allows organizations to provision remote development environments via Terraform. Prior to versions 2.29.7, 2.32.7, 2.33.8, and 2.34.2, Coder's OIDC callback checked `email_verified` with a direct Go `bool` type assertion. When an IdP returned the claim as a non-boolean (for example the string `"false"`) or omitted it, the assertion failed open and the email was treated as verified. Combined with an unconditional email-based account fallback, this enabled account takeover. The fix in versions 2.29.7, 2.32.7, 2.33.8, and 2.34.2 coerces `email_verified` across bool, string and numeric types (fail-closed) and blocks the email fallback when the matched user already has a different linked IdP subject. As a workaround, ensure the IdP returns `email_verified` as a native JSON boolean. The email-fallback linking issue has no configuration workaround; upgrading is required.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-07
UPDATED
Date2026-07-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2