Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Hach Korea (하크코리아)Hach Korea (하크코리아)
VS
DalkiaDalkia
Hach Korea (하크코리아)

Hach Korea (하크코리아)

5, Yeongdong-daero 106-gil, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, KR

Last Update: 15/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://kr.hach.com/
752/1000Fair

하크(Hach)는 수질 계측 및 분석 분야의 글로벌 리더로, 1942년 미국 아이오와 주에서 설립되었습니다. 독일에서 1933년 설립된 랑게(Lange)와 지난 2004년 합병하여 종합적인 수질 분석 라인업을 갖출 수 있게 되었습니다. 하크(Hach) 제품은 여러 수입 채널을 통해 국내 관공서 및 산업현장에 수십 년 전부터 사용되어 왔으며, 국내 지사인 하크코리아는 지난 2016년 설립되었습니다. 하크(Hach)는 Veralto의 환경 및 적용 솔루션 분야를 대표하는 Water...

NAICS:54162
NAICS Definition:Environmental Consulting Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:43
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Dalkia

Dalkia

204 rue Sadi Carnot , Saint-André-Lez-Lille, 59350, FR

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.dalkia.fr
776/1000Fair

Dalkia : ensemble, relevons le défi climatique ! Depuis 85 ans, Dalkia, filiale du groupe EDF et leader dans les services énergétiques, investit et développe les énergies renouvelables et de récupération et accompagne ses clients dans la durée pour les aider à faire des...

NAICS:54162
NAICS Definition:Environmental Consulting Services
Employees:14,374
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Hach Korea (하크코리아)

Hach Korea (하크코리아)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Dalkia

Dalkia

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hach Korea (하크코리아) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dalkia in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Hach Korea (하크코리아) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hach Korea (하크코리아) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Dalkia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dalkia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Hach Korea (하크코리아)

Hach Korea (하크코리아)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Dalkia

Dalkia

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Hach Korea (하크코리아) company and Dalkia company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Hach Korea (하크코리아) company and Dalkia company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Hach Korea (하크코리아) company and Dalkia company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Hach Korea (하크코리아) company and Dalkia company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Hach Korea (하크코리아) company and Dalkia company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Hach Korea (하크코리아) company and Dalkia company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Hach Korea (하크코리아) company and Dalkia company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Hach Korea (하크코리아) company and Dalkia company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Hach Korea (하크코리아) company and Dalkia company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Hach Korea (하크코리아) company and Dalkia company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Hach Korea (하크코리아) company and Dalkia company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Hach Korea (하크코리아) and Dalkia, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Hach Korea (하크코리아) and Dalkia, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Hach Korea (하크코리아) or Dalkia ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Hach Korea (하크코리아) or Dalkia ?
Between Hach Korea (하크코리아) and Dalkia, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Hach Korea (하크코리아) and Dalkia, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67595
SUMMARY

VaahCMS versions 2.0.0 through 2.3.4 contain a malicious obfuscated JavaScript payload embedded in the Blade template responsible for rendering security OTP emails, allowing remote attackers to execute unauthorized code in any browser that renders the affected email template with JavaScript enabled. The payload establishes a WebSocket connection to a hardcoded command-and-control endpoint, installs a password-field keylogger using MutationObserver to capture dynamically added inputs, scrapes WhatsApp Web DOM content, and accepts remote commands to redirect or overwrite the rendered page.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-15157
SUMMARY

undici does not validate the type property of a duck-typed blob-like request body before using it as the Content-Type header on the HTTP/1.1 dispatcher. In undici before 6.28.0, from 7.0.0 up to before 7.29.0, and from 8.0.0 up to before 8.9.0, an application that passes a hand-rolled blob-like body (via request, stream, pipeline, or dispatch) whose type is derived from untrusted input allows an attacker to inject CRLF sequences and append arbitrary HTTP headers, potentially smuggling a second request past the upstream. Native Blob objects are safe because their constructor strips CRLF from the type, and fetch is unaffected because it validates headers, but ecosystem libraries that build duck-typed blob shapes from user input can reach the vulnerable path. This is the same defect class as CVE-2022-35948 and CVE-2026-1527, on a header sink that the earlier fixes did not cover. The issue is fixed in undici 6.28.0, 7.29.0, and 8.9.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-14643
SUMMARY

undici's cache interceptor mishandles optional whitespace placed around the equals sign of a qualified no-cache or private Cache-Control directive. In undici from 7.0.0 up to before 7.29.0 and from 8.0.0 up to before 8.9.0, the parser either drops the directive or stores a field name with literal quote characters, so the cache decision fails to recognize the qualification and the response is stored. In shared-cache mode, this lets a response containing one user's authenticated data be served from cache to a later caller, including an unauthenticated one, when both requests resolve to the same cache key. It affects applications that enable the cache interceptor in shared mode, forward Authorization headers upstream, and receive cacheable responses with qualified directives padded with whitespace around the equals sign. This is the whitespace-around-equals variant that the fix for CVE-2026-9678 did not normalize, and it is fixed in undici 7.29.0 and 8.9.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2025-69945
SUMMARY

kishan0725 Hospital Management System 4.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in /doctor/edit-patient.php?editid=1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA